The Impact of the Weather Forecast Model on Improving AI-Based Power Generation Predictions through BiLSTM Networks

This study aims to comprehensively analyze five weather forecasting models obtained from the Open-Meteo historical data repository, with a specific emphasis on evaluating their impact in predicting wind power generation. Given the increasing focus on renewable energy, namely, wind power, accurate weather forecasting plays a crucial role in optimizing energy generation and ensuring the stability of the power system. The analysis conducted in this study incorporates a range of models, namely, ICOsahedral Nonhydrostatic (ICON), the Global Environmental Multiscale Model (GEM Global), Meteo France, the Global Forecast System (GSF Global), and the Best Match technique. The Best Match approach is a distinctive solution available from the weather forecast provider that combines the data from all available models to generate the most precise forecast for a particular area. The performance of these models was evaluated using various important metrics, including the mean squared error, the root mean squared error, the mean absolute error, the mean absolute percentage error, the coefficient of determination, and the normalized mean absolute error. The weather forecast model output was used as an essential input for the power generation prediction models during the evaluation process. This method was confirmed by comparing the predictions of these models with actual data on wind power generation. The ICON model, for example, outscored others with a root mean squared error of 1.7565, which is a tiny but essential improvement over Best Match, which had a root mean squared error of 1.7604. GEM Global and Gsf Global showed more dramatic changes, with root mean squared errors (RMSEs) of 2.0086 and 2.0242, respectively, indicating a loss in prediction accuracy of around 24% to 31% compared to ICON. Our findings reveal significant disparities in the precision of the various models used, and certain models exhibited significantly higher predictive precision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13173472
Primary Topic
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of the Weather Forecast Model on Improving AI-Based Power Generation Predictions through BiLSTM Networks

Raimondas Pomarnacki, Mindaugas Jankauskas, Artūras Serackis, Nerijus Paulauskas et al.
Electronics
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
article

The Impact of the Weather Forecast Model on Improving AI-Based Power Generation Predictions through BiLSTM Networks

Raimondas Pomarnacki, Mindaugas Jankauskas, Artūras Serackis, Nerijus Paulauskas, Van Khang Hyunh
article en

Abstract

This study aims to comprehensively analyze five weather forecasting models obtained from the Open-Meteo historical data repository, with a specific emphasis on evaluating their impact in predicting wind power generation. Given the increasing focus on renewable energy, namely, wind power, accurate weather forecasting plays a crucial role in optimizing energy generation and ensuring the stability of the power system. The analysis conducted in this study incorporates a range of models, namely, ICOsahedral Nonhydrostatic (ICON), the Global Environmental Multiscale Model (GEM Global), Meteo France, the Global Forecast System (GSF Global), and the Best Match technique. The Best Match approach is a distinctive solution available from the weather forecast provider that combines the data from all available models to generate the most precise forecast for a particular area. The performance of these models was evaluated using various important metrics, including the mean squared error, the root mean squared error, the mean absolute error, the mean absolute percentage error, the coefficient of determination, and the normalized mean absolute error. The weather forecast model output was used as an essential input for the power generation prediction models during the evaluation process. This method was confirmed by comparing the predictions of these models with actual data on wind power generation. The ICON model, for example, outscored others with a root mean squared error of 1.7565, which is a tiny but essential improvement over Best Match, which had a root mean squared error of 1.7604. GEM Global and Gsf Global showed more dramatic changes, with root mean squared errors (RMSEs) of 2.0086 and 2.0242, respectively, indicating a loss in prediction accuracy of around 24% to 31% compared to ICON. Our findings reveal significant disparities in the precision of the various models used, and certain models exhibited significantly higher predictive precision.

ElectronicsVol. 13(17)
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (LT), University of Agder (NO)
Lietuvos Mokslo Taryba
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.