The Relationship between Treatment Response and Overall Survival in Borderline, Non-Resectable and Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX

<b>Background</b>: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-recommended treatment for patients with borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) involves a combination of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy and the curative surgical resection of the tumor. This study seeks to identify the clinical, radiological, laboratory, and pathologic predictors that can anticipate the oncological outcomes of patients. <b>Methods</b>: In this study, we conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone curative surgical resection for BRPC, LAPC, or resectable disease with high-risk features after receiving neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX at two institutions. We evaluated by means of multivariate analysis whether clinical and laboratory response, tumor markers, radiological response, and pathologic tumor response grade correlated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). <b>Results</b>: The study enrolled a total of 70 patients with BRPC, LAPC, and resectable disease with high-risk features who underwent resection after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX. Age above 65 years and fewer than nine cycles of chemotherapy (OR 4.2; 95% CI 1.4-12.0; <i>p</i>-value 0.007); locally advanced tumors after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) (OR 7.0; 95% CI 1.9-25.7; <i>p</i>-value 0.003); and lymph node disease and histological tumor regression grade 2 and 3 (OR 4.3; 95% CI 0.9-19.2; <i>p</i>-value 0.05) were risk factors linked to adverse OS and DFS. The median OS and DFS were 33 (22-43.9) months and 16.5 (11.3-21.6) months, respectively. <b>Conclusions</b>: Classification as a LA tumor after NAT was the only preoperative radiological factor that predicted adverse survival in patients undergoing curative surgery after NAT. Other clinical, biochemical, and radiological measures of response were not found to predict OS. Patient age, the cumulative administration of more than eight cycles of chemotherapy, and a significant pathological response were associated with better OS. The results of this study are important for treatment decision-making and prognostication in patients with BRPC and LAPC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175206
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Relationship between Treatment Response and Overall Survival in Borderline, Non-Resectable and Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX

Sharon Pelles Avraham, Eli Brazowski, Diego Mercer, Nir Lubezky et al.
4 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
1.13
article

The Relationship between Treatment Response and Overall Survival in Borderline, Non-Resectable and Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX

Sharon Pelles Avraham, Eli Brazowski, Diego Mercer, Nir Lubezky, Sharon Halperin, Kapil Sahnan, Or Goren, Alex Gaffan, Joseph M. Klausner, Alex Barenboim
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-recommended treatment for patients with borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) involves a combination of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy and the curative surgical resection of the tumor. This study seeks to identify the clinical, radiological, laboratory, and pathologic predictors that can anticipate the oncological outcomes of patients. <b>Methods</b>: In this study, we conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone curative surgical resection for BRPC, LAPC, or resectable disease with high-risk features after receiving neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX at two institutions. We evaluated by means of multivariate analysis whether clinical and laboratory response, tumor markers, radiological response, and pathologic tumor response grade correlated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). <b>Results</b>: The study enrolled a total of 70 patients with BRPC, LAPC, and resectable disease with high-risk features who underwent resection after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX. Age above 65 years and fewer than nine cycles of chemotherapy (OR 4.2; 95% CI 1.4-12.0; <i>p</i>-value 0.007); locally advanced tumors after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) (OR 7.0; 95% CI 1.9-25.7; <i>p</i>-value 0.003); and lymph node disease and histological tumor regression grade 2 and 3 (OR 4.3; 95% CI 0.9-19.2; <i>p</i>-value 0.05) were risk factors linked to adverse OS and DFS. The median OS and DFS were 33 (22-43.9) months and 16.5 (11.3-21.6) months, respectively. <b>Conclusions</b>: Classification as a LA tumor after NAT was the only preoperative radiological factor that predicted adverse survival in patients undergoing curative surgery after NAT. Other clinical, biochemical, and radiological measures of response were not found to predict OS. Patient age, the cumulative administration of more than eight cycles of chemotherapy, and a significant pathological response were associated with better OS. The results of this study are important for treatment decision-making and prognostication in patients with BRPC and LAPC.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(17)
Tel Aviv University (IL), Sheba Medical Center (IL), Imperial College London (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.