Is addition definable from multiplication and successor?
Abstract A map <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>f</m:mi> <m:mo>:</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>R</m:mi> <m:mo>→</m:mo> <m:mi>S</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> {f\colon R\to S} between (associative, unital, but not necessarily commutative) rings is a brachymorphism if <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>f</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mn>1</m:mn> <m:mo>+</m:mo> <m:mi>x</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mn>1</m:mn> <m:mo>+</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>f</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mi>x</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> {f(1+x)=1+f(x)} and <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>f</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>x</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mi>y</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>f</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mi>x</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mi>f</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mi>y</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> {f(xy)=f(x)f(y)} whenever <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>x</m:mi> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:mi>y</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo>∈</m:mo> <m:mi>R</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:math> {x,y\in R} . We tackle the problem whether every brachymorphism is additive (i.e., <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>f</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>x</m:mi> <m:mo>+</m:mo> <m:mi>y</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>f</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mi>x</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> <m:mo>+</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>f</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mi>y</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> {f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)} ), showing that in many contexts, including the following, the answer is positive: • R is finite (or, more generally, R is left or right Artinian); • R is any ring of <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mn>2</m:mn> <m:mo>×</m:mo> <m:mn>2</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:math> {2\times 2} matrices over a commutative ring; </jats:l
Authors
- Friedrich Wehrung (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4868-606X)
Institutions
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Normandie Université (FR)
- Université de Caen Normandie (FR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Forum Mathematicum
- Published
- 2024-09-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1515/forum-2024-0245
- Primary Topic
- Rings, Modules, and Algebras
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00