Development of a coupled agent-based generation expansion planning tool with a power dispatch model

• We coupled an agent-based capacity expansion tool with a power dispatch model • Agents are power generation companies making investment decisions independently • Agents’ prior beliefs about climate risk affect their investment decisions • We show effects of climate change and technology evolution on agents’ decisions Power companies need to adapt their generation expansion planning in response to changing market, climate and regulatory conditions as global warming, electrification, and technology breakthroughs continue. To fortify energy system resilience, it is critical to understand the collective effects of their autonomous decisions on power systems operations and reliability. To this end, we developed an integrated framework, an agent-based model (ABM) coupled with a power dispatch model (PDM) (referred to as ABM-PDM), tested on the Texas 123-bus transmission system in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) region. Agents (power generation companies) can invest in natural gas, solar, and wind technologies to maximize profits from 2021 to 2050, using market information from the PDM based on their capital budget and perceived costs, financial incentives for renewable energy, and climate risks. We applied ABM-PDM to assess how power companies respond to future technological advancements and climate change. After demonstrating model credibility, we explored 25 combinations of cost and capacity factors reflecting a variety of technological evolution trajectories. Results indicated that to replace wind over solar for replacing existing fossil-fuel power plants due to lower costs and higher capacity factors. Additionally, as more agents invest, the energy market becomes more competitive, and system-wide electricity prices drop. We also analyzed the impacts of temperature increases on investments using seven projections, from 0 to 6 °C, during the modeling period. The results showed that as temperatures rise, agents invest more to accommodate the increasing loads. ABM-PDM incorporates risk attitude and learning into companies’ decision-making, providing additional information on generation expansion for the non-optimal future of power systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy and Climate Change
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2024.100156
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Electric Power System Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a coupled agent-based generation expansion planning tool with a power dispatch model

Lu Jin, A Ghaffari, Xingpeng Li, Fengwei Hung et al.
3 citations
Energy and Climate Change
Electric Power System Optimization
0.63
article

Development of a coupled agent-based generation expansion planning tool with a power dispatch model

Lu Jin, A Ghaffari, Xingpeng Li, Fengwei Hung, Yi‐Chen E. Yang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• We coupled an agent-based capacity expansion tool with a power dispatch model • Agents are power generation companies making investment decisions independently • Agents’ prior beliefs about climate risk affect their investment decisions • We show effects of climate change and technology evolution on agents’ decisions Power companies need to adapt their generation expansion planning in response to changing market, climate and regulatory conditions as global warming, electrification, and technology breakthroughs continue. To fortify energy system resilience, it is critical to understand the collective effects of their autonomous decisions on power systems operations and reliability. To this end, we developed an integrated framework, an agent-based model (ABM) coupled with a power dispatch model (PDM) (referred to as ABM-PDM), tested on the Texas 123-bus transmission system in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) region. Agents (power generation companies) can invest in natural gas, solar, and wind technologies to maximize profits from 2021 to 2050, using market information from the PDM based on their capital budget and perceived costs, financial incentives for renewable energy, and climate risks. We applied ABM-PDM to assess how power companies respond to future technological advancements and climate change. After demonstrating model credibility, we explored 25 combinations of cost and capacity factors reflecting a variety of technological evolution trajectories. Results indicated that to replace wind over solar for replacing existing fossil-fuel power plants due to lower costs and higher capacity factors. Additionally, as more agents invest, the energy market becomes more competitive, and system-wide electricity prices drop. We also analyzed the impacts of temperature increases on investments using seven projections, from 0 to 6 °C, during the modeling period. The results showed that as temperatures rise, agents invest more to accommodate the increasing loads. ABM-PDM incorporates risk attitude and learning into companies’ decision-making, providing additional information on generation expansion for the non-optimal future of power systems.

Energy and Climate ChangeVol. 5
University of Notre Dame (US), Lehigh University (US), University of Houston (US)
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Electric Power System Optimization
0.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.