Pooling and winsorizing machine learning forecasts to predict stock returns with high-dimensional data

We evaluate US market return predictability using a novel data set of several hundred ag- gregated firm-level characteristics. We apply LASSO, Elastic Net, Random Forest, Neural Net, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and Light Gradient Boosting Machine methods and find these models experience large prediction errors that lead to forecast failures. However, winsorizing and pooling machine learning model forecasts provides consistent out-of-sample predictability. To assess robustness, we apply machine learning methods to high-dimensional data for Canada, China, Germany and the UK as well as the Goyal-Welch data. All machine learning models we consider, except for the ensemble pooled methods, fail to significantly predict returns across our samples, highlighting the importance of pooling, evaluating additional economies, and the fragility of individual machine learning methods. Our results sheds light on the sparsity versus density debate as the degree of sparsity and variable importance evolves over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Empirical Finance
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2024.101538
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pooling and winsorizing machine learning forecasts to predict stock returns with high-dimensional data

Jack Strauss, Erik Mekelburg
3 citations
Journal of Empirical Finance
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
1.47
article

Pooling and winsorizing machine learning forecasts to predict stock returns with high-dimensional data

Jack Strauss, Erik Mekelburg
article en
3 citations

Abstract

We evaluate US market return predictability using a novel data set of several hundred ag- gregated firm-level characteristics. We apply LASSO, Elastic Net, Random Forest, Neural Net, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and Light Gradient Boosting Machine methods and find these models experience large prediction errors that lead to forecast failures. However, winsorizing and pooling machine learning model forecasts provides consistent out-of-sample predictability. To assess robustness, we apply machine learning methods to high-dimensional data for Canada, China, Germany and the UK as well as the Goyal-Welch data. All machine learning models we consider, except for the ensemble pooled methods, fail to significantly predict returns across our samples, highlighting the importance of pooling, evaluating additional economies, and the fragility of individual machine learning methods. Our results sheds light on the sparsity versus density debate as the degree of sparsity and variable importance evolves over time.

Journal of Empirical FinanceVol. 79
University of Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pooling and winsorizing machine learning forecasts to predict stock returns with high-dimensional data — Jack Strauss, Erik Mekelburg · Journal of Empirical Finance (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS