The Best Start Trial: A randomised controlled trial of ultra-early parent-administered physiotherapy for infants at high risk of cerebral palsy or motor delay

In this pilot trial, there was no clinically worthwhile effect of ultra-early parent-administered physiotherapy over usual care on the AIMS. However, the intervention was feasible for infants, acceptable to parents and parents perceived a benefit of treatment. Whilst this trial did not demonstrate treatment effectiveness using the AIMS, these findings should be interpreted cautiously because of the small sample size, the low responsivity of the AIMS to change in motor performance and the heterogeneity of the participants. Therefore, the intervention should not be abandoned on the basis of this trial, but rather further evaluated in a larger trial that addresses some of the learnings from this one.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Early Human Development
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2024.106111
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Infant Development and Preterm Care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Best Start Trial: A randomised controlled trial of ultra-early parent-administered physiotherapy for infants at high risk of cerebral palsy or motor delay

Genevieve Dwyer, Lisa A. Harvey, Iona Novak, Elizabeth Jane Elliott et al.
4 citations
Early Human Development
Infant Development and Preterm Care
4.44
article

The Best Start Trial: A randomised controlled trial of ultra-early parent-administered physiotherapy for infants at high risk of cerebral palsy or motor delay

Genevieve Dwyer, Lisa A. Harvey, Iona Novak, Elizabeth Jane Elliott, Barbara R. Lucas, Nadia A. Badawi, V. Venkatesha, Catherine Morgan, J. Richard Bowen
article en
4 citations

Abstract

In this pilot trial, there was no clinically worthwhile effect of ultra-early parent-administered physiotherapy over usual care on the AIMS. However, the intervention was feasible for infants, acceptable to parents and parents perceived a benefit of treatment. Whilst this trial did not demonstrate treatment effectiveness using the AIMS, these findings should be interpreted cautiously because of the small sample size, the low responsivity of the AIMS to change in motor performance and the heterogeneity of the participants. Therefore, the intervention should not be abandoned on the basis of this trial, but rather further evaluated in a larger trial that addresses some of the learnings from this one.

Early Human DevelopmentVol. 198
The University of Sydney (AU), New South Wales Department of Health (AU), Cerebral Palsy Alliance (AU), Royal North Shore Hospital (AU), Northern Sydney Local Health District (AU), Sydney Local Health District (AU), Sydney Children’s Hospitals Network (AU), Western Sydney University (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Infant Development and Preterm Care
4.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.