Practice variation using the hybrid stage I procedure in congenital heart disease: Results from a national survey

There is significant variation in practice patterns for hybrid stage I palliation indications, technical aspects, and postoperative care. Therefore, generalizability of single-center studies on outcomes after hybrid stage I palliation is limited. Future multicenter studies are needed to best delineate which patients benefit most from hybrid stage I palliation and to further define optimal approaches to caring for these patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JTCVS Open
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2024.07.020
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practice variation using the hybrid stage I procedure in congenital heart disease: Results from a national survey

Ray Lowery, Dominic Zanaboni, Sunkyung Yu, Jeffrey D. Zampi et al.
1 citations
JTCVS Open
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
0.39
article

Practice variation using the hybrid stage I procedure in congenital heart disease: Results from a national survey

Ray Lowery, Dominic Zanaboni, Sunkyung Yu, Jeffrey D. Zampi, C. Todd Sower, Jennifer C. Romano
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There is significant variation in practice patterns for hybrid stage I palliation indications, technical aspects, and postoperative care. Therefore, generalizability of single-center studies on outcomes after hybrid stage I palliation is limited. Future multicenter studies are needed to best delineate which patients benefit most from hybrid stage I palliation and to further define optimal approaches to caring for these patients.

JTCVS OpenVol. 21
Washington University in St. Louis (US), University of Michigan (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
0.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.