Effects of whole-day versus half-day cow-calf contact on cows’ and calves’ performance

Cow-calf contact systems (CCCs), where dairy cows nurse their own calves for several weeks while being milked, have some advantages in terms of animal welfare. However, one major challenge is the loss of collected milk due to suckling and milk ejection problems during milking. Reducing daily CCC can decrease milk losses. Our study investigated the effect of half-day CCC during daytime (HC, n = 11 cows) compared to whole-day contact (WC, n = 13) and no contact (NC, n = 14) on harvested milk yield, milk content, udder health, calving interval, and calf weight gain in a dual purpose breed-herd with concentrate-free feeding. 'Nursing' (9 weeks postpartum) was followed by separation of cow and calf, but still with visual CCC and twice daily milk feeding by nipple buckets (6 l per day, 'in sight/milk feeding'). During the 11th-12th week, calves were housed out of sight and gradually weaned. Calves of NC were separated from their mothers 1 day postpartum, obtained 6 l whole-milk per day and were gradually weaned. During 'nursing', NC and HC cows gave more milk than WC in the morning. In the evening, HC and WC gave less milk than NC, but HC cows had also a slightly lower milk yield than WC. During 'nursing', a reduced fat content (-1% point) pointed at milk ejection problems in both CCC treatments independent from daytime. After separation from the calf (periods: 'in sight/milk feeding' and 'out of sight/weaning') and over the whole lactation, milk yield between HC and the other treatments did not significantly differ while WC cows gave less milk than NC cows. Protein contents were higher in dams than in NC. There were no indications of differences in the incidence of mastitis, somatic cell score or calving interval between treatments. During 'nursing', NC calves gained about 0.3 kg less per day than CCC-calves (n<sub>NC</sub> = 12, n<sub>HC</sub> = 7, n<sub>WC</sub> = 10). After separation from the mother, there was a growth check in both CCC groups. During 'in sight/milk feeding', HC gained less weight than NC and WC (n<sub>NC</sub> = 11, n<sub>HC</sub> = 9, n<sub>WC</sub> = 10). Hereafter, weight development did not differ. Two weeks after weaning, nursed calves were still significantly heavier than NC (n = 5-8). Nine weeks of HC during the day compared to WC helped to reduce losses of sellable milk during the nursing period and over the whole lactation while calf development was similar.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
animal
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2024.101318
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of whole-day versus half-day cow-calf contact on cows’ and calves’ performance

Ute Knierim, Katharina A. Zipp
6 citations
animal
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
3.83
article

Effects of whole-day versus half-day cow-calf contact on cows’ and calves’ performance

Ute Knierim, Katharina A. Zipp
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Cow-calf contact systems (CCCs), where dairy cows nurse their own calves for several weeks while being milked, have some advantages in terms of animal welfare. However, one major challenge is the loss of collected milk due to suckling and milk ejection problems during milking. Reducing daily CCC can decrease milk losses. Our study investigated the effect of half-day CCC during daytime (HC, n = 11 cows) compared to whole-day contact (WC, n = 13) and no contact (NC, n = 14) on harvested milk yield, milk content, udder health, calving interval, and calf weight gain in a dual purpose breed-herd with concentrate-free feeding. 'Nursing' (9 weeks postpartum) was followed by separation of cow and calf, but still with visual CCC and twice daily milk feeding by nipple buckets (6 l per day, 'in sight/milk feeding'). During the 11th-12th week, calves were housed out of sight and gradually weaned. Calves of NC were separated from their mothers 1 day postpartum, obtained 6 l whole-milk per day and were gradually weaned. During 'nursing', NC and HC cows gave more milk than WC in the morning. In the evening, HC and WC gave less milk than NC, but HC cows had also a slightly lower milk yield than WC. During 'nursing', a reduced fat content (-1% point) pointed at milk ejection problems in both CCC treatments independent from daytime. After separation from the calf (periods: 'in sight/milk feeding' and 'out of sight/weaning') and over the whole lactation, milk yield between HC and the other treatments did not significantly differ while WC cows gave less milk than NC cows. Protein contents were higher in dams than in NC. There were no indications of differences in the incidence of mastitis, somatic cell score or calving interval between treatments. During 'nursing', NC calves gained about 0.3 kg less per day than CCC-calves (n<sub>NC</sub> = 12, n<sub>HC</sub> = 7, n<sub>WC</sub> = 10). After separation from the mother, there was a growth check in both CCC groups. During 'in sight/milk feeding', HC gained less weight than NC and WC (n<sub>NC</sub> = 11, n<sub>HC</sub> = 9, n<sub>WC</sub> = 10). Hereafter, weight development did not differ. Two weeks after weaning, nursed calves were still significantly heavier than NC (n = 5-8). Nine weeks of HC during the day compared to WC helped to reduce losses of sellable milk during the nursing period and over the whole lactation while calf development was similar.

animalVol. 18(10)
University of Kassel (DE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
3.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.