Robot Path Planning and Tracking with the Flower Pollination SearchOptimization Algorithm

Robot path planning and tracking involve two critical aspects of autonomous navigation systems: determining an optimal route for the robot to follow and ensuring that it accurately adheres to this path in real-time. Path planning focuses on generating a feasible and efficient trajectory from a starting point to a destination while considering obstacles, dynamic environments, and constraints. This paper investigates the effectiveness of the Flower Pollination Search Optimization (FPSO) algorithm for robot path planning and compares its performance with traditional algorithms such as A* Algorithm, Dijkstra, and Rapidlyexploring Random Tree (RRT). The FPSO algorithm was evaluated across three distinct scenarios, demonstrating superior performance in terms of path length, computation time, and path smoothness. In Scenario 1, FPSO achieved an optimized path length of 10.5 meters with a computation time of 3.2 seconds, a path smoothness score of 8.9, and a path efficiency of 95%. In Scenario 2, FPSO resulted in a path length of 12.3 meters and a computation time of 3.5 seconds, with a smoothness score of 8.7 and an efficiency of 93%. Scenario 3 showed FPSO's best performance, with a path length of 9.8 meters, computation time of 3.0 seconds, a smoothness score of 9.0, and a path efficiency of 96%. Comparatively, the A* Algorithm, Dijkstra, and RRT exhibited longer path lengths and higher computation times, with lower smoothness scores and efficiencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer Allied Intelligence (JCAI).
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69996/jcai.2024020
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robot Path Planning and Tracking with the Flower Pollination SearchOptimization Algorithm

Putta Brundavani, Y Avanija
2 citations
Journal of Computer Allied Intelligence (JCAI).
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
0.50
article

Robot Path Planning and Tracking with the Flower Pollination SearchOptimization Algorithm

Putta Brundavani, Y Avanija
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Robot path planning and tracking involve two critical aspects of autonomous navigation systems: determining an optimal route for the robot to follow and ensuring that it accurately adheres to this path in real-time. Path planning focuses on generating a feasible and efficient trajectory from a starting point to a destination while considering obstacles, dynamic environments, and constraints. This paper investigates the effectiveness of the Flower Pollination Search Optimization (FPSO) algorithm for robot path planning and compares its performance with traditional algorithms such as A* Algorithm, Dijkstra, and Rapidlyexploring Random Tree (RRT). The FPSO algorithm was evaluated across three distinct scenarios, demonstrating superior performance in terms of path length, computation time, and path smoothness. In Scenario 1, FPSO achieved an optimized path length of 10.5 meters with a computation time of 3.2 seconds, a path smoothness score of 8.9, and a path efficiency of 95%. In Scenario 2, FPSO resulted in a path length of 12.3 meters and a computation time of 3.5 seconds, with a smoothness score of 8.7 and an efficiency of 93%. Scenario 3 showed FPSO's best performance, with a path length of 9.8 meters, computation time of 3.0 seconds, a smoothness score of 9.0, and a path efficiency of 96%. Comparatively, the A* Algorithm, Dijkstra, and RRT exhibited longer path lengths and higher computation times, with lower smoothness scores and efficiencies.

Journal of Computer Allied Intelligence (JCAI).Vol. 2(4)
Vikrama Simhapuri University (IN), Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Anantapur (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
0.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.