Analysis of Short-selling Effects Using KOSPI200 and KOSDAQ150 Indexing

Financial regulators often react to crises by restricting short-selling to stabilize the stock market. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Korean government banned short-selling in 2020. Since 2021, it has allowed partial resumption only for stocks indexed in KOSPI200 and KOSDAQ150. This unique short-selling regime in Korea makes newly indexed or excluded stocks experience exogenous variations in their short-selling availability when the constituents of the two indices are updated. Using this quasi-natural experimental setting, we examine the impact of short-selling permission and ban. The results show that short-selling permission enhances stocks’ price efficiencies while short-selling permission and ban do not strongly influence stock return or volatility. Overall, this paper provides empirical evidence supporting the positive role of short-selling, further casting doubts on the reasons behind banning short-selling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Journal of Financial Studies
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26845/kjfs.2024.08.53.4.393
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Short-selling Effects Using KOSPI200 and KOSDAQ150 Indexing

Hyeong Joon Kim, Hohyun Kim
1 citations
Korean Journal of Financial Studies
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
0.54
article

Analysis of Short-selling Effects Using KOSPI200 and KOSDAQ150 Indexing

Hyeong Joon Kim, Hohyun Kim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Financial regulators often react to crises by restricting short-selling to stabilize the stock market. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Korean government banned short-selling in 2020. Since 2021, it has allowed partial resumption only for stocks indexed in KOSPI200 and KOSDAQ150. This unique short-selling regime in Korea makes newly indexed or excluded stocks experience exogenous variations in their short-selling availability when the constituents of the two indices are updated. Using this quasi-natural experimental setting, we examine the impact of short-selling permission and ban. The results show that short-selling permission enhances stocks’ price efficiencies while short-selling permission and ban do not strongly influence stock return or volatility. Overall, this paper provides empirical evidence supporting the positive role of short-selling, further casting doubts on the reasons behind banning short-selling.

Korean Journal of Financial StudiesVol. 53(4)
Handong Global University (KR), Dongguk University (KR), Global University (LB)
Ministry of Education, National Research Foundation of Korea
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.