Trends in authorship of original articles in three high-impact medical journals: a decade-by-decade analysis from 2003 to 2023

Background: The study analyzes trends in the average number of authors per “original article” in three high-impact scientific journals (The Journal of the American Medical Association [JAMA], The New England Journal of Medicine [NEJM], and The Lancet [TL]) over two decades. Methods: The mean number of authors per publication was calculated and compared across the two decades. Comparisons were made both by publication year and by journal. Results: A total of 1645 articles were included: 529 (39.15%) from JAMA, 627 (38.11%) from NEJM, and 510 (31.0%) from TL. The mean number of authors in 2003 was 10.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 5-12, range 1-382), in 2013 it was 20.4 (IQR 9-21, range 1-596), and in 2023 it was 40.5 (IQR 15-33, range 2-785). Significant differences were found in the number of authors between years, with a rising trend in the mean (p < 0.001). A higher increase rate in authors was observed compared to the collected literature, possibly due to the exclusive selection of original articles. As a secondary result, significant differences were found in the number of authors between TL and NEJM (p = 0.003), as well as between TL and JAMA (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between JAMA and NEJM (p = 0.180). Conclusions: The mean number of authors per original article in the journals JAMA, NEJM, and TL has increased from 2003 to 2023, with a mean of 9.84 between 2003 and 2013 and 20.1 between 2013 and 2023. Our findings align with the trend of increasing authorship observed in the collected literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina Universitaria
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24875/rmu.24000020
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trends in authorship of original articles in three high-impact medical journals: a decade-by-decade analysis from 2003 to 2023

David Gómez‐Almaguer, Juan P. Martínez-Hernández, Yesica A. López-Mora, Sofía I. Quezada-Ramírez
Medicina Universitaria
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

Trends in authorship of original articles in three high-impact medical journals: a decade-by-decade analysis from 2003 to 2023

David Gómez‐Almaguer, Juan P. Martínez-Hernández, Yesica A. López-Mora, Sofía I. Quezada-Ramírez
article en

Abstract

Background: The study analyzes trends in the average number of authors per “original article” in three high-impact scientific journals (The Journal of the American Medical Association [JAMA], The New England Journal of Medicine [NEJM], and The Lancet [TL]) over two decades. Methods: The mean number of authors per publication was calculated and compared across the two decades. Comparisons were made both by publication year and by journal. Results: A total of 1645 articles were included: 529 (39.15%) from JAMA, 627 (38.11%) from NEJM, and 510 (31.0%) from TL. The mean number of authors in 2003 was 10.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 5-12, range 1-382), in 2013 it was 20.4 (IQR 9-21, range 1-596), and in 2023 it was 40.5 (IQR 15-33, range 2-785). Significant differences were found in the number of authors between years, with a rising trend in the mean (p < 0.001). A higher increase rate in authors was observed compared to the collected literature, possibly due to the exclusive selection of original articles. As a secondary result, significant differences were found in the number of authors between TL and NEJM (p = 0.003), as well as between TL and JAMA (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between JAMA and NEJM (p = 0.180). Conclusions: The mean number of authors per original article in the journals JAMA, NEJM, and TL has increased from 2003 to 2023, with a mean of 9.84 between 2003 and 2013 and 20.1 between 2013 and 2023. Our findings align with the trend of increasing authorship observed in the collected literature.

Medicina UniversitariaVol. 26(3)
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León (MX), American Medical Association (US), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.