Serum neurofilament light release levels as marker of neurotoxicity in general anesthesia versus hypnosis: A prospective non-randomized trial

Background: Whether general anesthetics induce neurotoxicity is unclear. Objectives: We hypothesized that serum neurofilament light (NfL) release, a marker of neural injury, would not be different in patients receiving general anesthesia (GA) compared to hypnosis. Design: Prospective, non-randomized. Setting: Tertiary university hospital. Methods: Patients undergoing breast cancer or thyroid/parathyroid surgery were enrolled. Propofol and remifentanil were used for GA. For hypnosis, only low dose remifentanil was allowed. Main outcome measures: NfL was measured at baseline, at day 1 and at postoperative visit. At preoperative and postoperative visit, patients performed a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test. Primary outcome was absolute change in NfL at day 1 between groups. Results: Among 100 included patients, 51 were in GA and 49 in hypnosis group. There were 26/49 (53%) breast cancer patients in hypnosis group and 13/51 (26%) in GA arm, p = 0.005. Baseline NfL was higher in the hypnosis group (p = 0.050). We subtracted log-transformed baseline NfL from postoperative NfL to analyze normalized values as absolute change. The mean normalized value at day 1 (primary endpoint) was 0.02 (± 0.11) in the GA and 0.03 (± 0.20) in the hypnosis group; p = 0.979 [d = 0.16, 95% CI: -0.40 to 0.39]. In a linear mixed-effects model including variables that influenced baseline NfL (advanced age, higher creatinine values, breast cancer), mean difference (95 % CI) in absolute change of log NfL at day 1 between both groups was 0.007 (- 0.04 to 0.06); p = 0.791. A change in MoCA as compared to baseline was not different between groups (p = 0.761). Conclusions: Our results show that there was no statistical or clinical difference in postoperative NfL release between GA and hypnosis. GA with propofol was not associated with a different risk of neural injury compared to hypnosis. Trial registration: NCT04500236.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56126/75.3.48
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Serum neurofilament light release levels as marker of neurotoxicity in general anesthesia versus hypnosis: A prospective non-randomized trial

Nassim Touil, Victoria Van Regemorter, Michel Mourad, Martine Berlière et al.
Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica
Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
article

Serum neurofilament light release levels as marker of neurotoxicity in general anesthesia versus hypnosis: A prospective non-randomized trial

Nassim Touil, Victoria Van Regemorter, Michel Mourad, Martine Berlière, Annie Robert, Mona Momeni, Bianca Robu, Christine Watremez, Charlotte Elisabeth Teunissen, Fabienne Roelants, I.-M. Lupu, S Abene, Antoine Buemi, Frédéric Mestdagh, M.-A. Docquier
article en

Abstract

Background: Whether general anesthetics induce neurotoxicity is unclear. Objectives: We hypothesized that serum neurofilament light (NfL) release, a marker of neural injury, would not be different in patients receiving general anesthesia (GA) compared to hypnosis. Design: Prospective, non-randomized. Setting: Tertiary university hospital. Methods: Patients undergoing breast cancer or thyroid/parathyroid surgery were enrolled. Propofol and remifentanil were used for GA. For hypnosis, only low dose remifentanil was allowed. Main outcome measures: NfL was measured at baseline, at day 1 and at postoperative visit. At preoperative and postoperative visit, patients performed a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test. Primary outcome was absolute change in NfL at day 1 between groups. Results: Among 100 included patients, 51 were in GA and 49 in hypnosis group. There were 26/49 (53%) breast cancer patients in hypnosis group and 13/51 (26%) in GA arm, p = 0.005. Baseline NfL was higher in the hypnosis group (p = 0.050). We subtracted log-transformed baseline NfL from postoperative NfL to analyze normalized values as absolute change. The mean normalized value at day 1 (primary endpoint) was 0.02 (± 0.11) in the GA and 0.03 (± 0.20) in the hypnosis group; p = 0.979 [d = 0.16, 95% CI: -0.40 to 0.39]. In a linear mixed-effects model including variables that influenced baseline NfL (advanced age, higher creatinine values, breast cancer), mean difference (95 % CI) in absolute change of log NfL at day 1 between both groups was 0.007 (- 0.04 to 0.06); p = 0.791. A change in MoCA as compared to baseline was not different between groups (p = 0.761). Conclusions: Our results show that there was no statistical or clinical difference in postoperative NfL release between GA and hypnosis. GA with propofol was not associated with a different risk of neural injury compared to hypnosis. Trial registration: NCT04500236.

Acta Anaesthesiologica BelgicaVol. 75(3)
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE), UCLouvain (BE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.