Theoretical concepts as goal-derived concepts

In this paper, I will focus on the nature of theoretical concepts, i.e., the psychological entities related to theoretical terms in science. I will first argue that the standard picture of theoretical concepts in twentieth-century philosophy of science understood them as representation-oriented common taxonomic concepts. However, I will show how, in light of recent pragmatist approaches to scientific laws and theories, several important theoretical concepts in science do not seem to fit such picture. I will then argue that these theoretical concepts should be understood instead as goal-derived concepts, since their construction and use exhibit the typical characteristics that cognitive scientists assign to goal-derived concepts. I will furthermore argue that the existence of theoretical concepts that are goal-derived concepts represents yet another example of the central role that human goals play in science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.08.004
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Theoretical concepts as goal-derived concepts

Matteo De Benedetto
2 citations
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
Philosophy and History of Science
12.08
article

Theoretical concepts as goal-derived concepts

Matteo De Benedetto
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In this paper, I will focus on the nature of theoretical concepts, i.e., the psychological entities related to theoretical terms in science. I will first argue that the standard picture of theoretical concepts in twentieth-century philosophy of science understood them as representation-oriented common taxonomic concepts. However, I will show how, in light of recent pragmatist approaches to scientific laws and theories, several important theoretical concepts in science do not seem to fit such picture. I will then argue that these theoretical concepts should be understood instead as goal-derived concepts, since their construction and use exhibit the typical characteristics that cognitive scientists assign to goal-derived concepts. I will furthermore argue that the existence of theoretical concepts that are goal-derived concepts represents yet another example of the central role that human goals play in science.

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part AVol. 107
University Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Philosophy and History of Science
12.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.