HAYCAM VS EIGENCAM FOR WEAKLY-SUPERVISED OBJECT DETECTION ACROSS VARYING SCALES

When a classification process is performed using Class Activation Maps, which is one of the Explainable Artificial Intelligence approaches, the areas influencing the classification on the input image can be revealed. In other words, it is demonstrated which part of the image the classifier model looks at to make a decision. In this study, a 200-class classification model was trained using the open-source dataset CUB 200 2011, and the classification results were visualized using the EigenCAM and HayCAM methods. When comparing object detection performances based on the areas influencing classification, the EigenCAM method reaches an IoU (Intersection over Union) value of 30.88%, while the HayCAM method reaches a value of 41.95%. The obtained results indicate that outputs derived using Principal Component Analysis (HayCAM) are better than those obtained using Singular Value Decomposition (EigenCAM).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17780/ksujes.1430479
Primary Topic
Advanced Neural Network Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

HAYCAM VS EIGENCAM FOR WEAKLY-SUPERVISED OBJECT DETECTION ACROSS VARYING SCALES

Murat Ceylan, Ahmet Haydar Örnek
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi
Advanced Neural Network Applications
article

HAYCAM VS EIGENCAM FOR WEAKLY-SUPERVISED OBJECT DETECTION ACROSS VARYING SCALES

Murat Ceylan, Ahmet Haydar Örnek
article en

Abstract

When a classification process is performed using Class Activation Maps, which is one of the Explainable Artificial Intelligence approaches, the areas influencing the classification on the input image can be revealed. In other words, it is demonstrated which part of the image the classifier model looks at to make a decision. In this study, a 200-class classification model was trained using the open-source dataset CUB 200 2011, and the classification results were visualized using the EigenCAM and HayCAM methods. When comparing object detection performances based on the areas influencing classification, the EigenCAM method reaches an IoU (Intersection over Union) value of 30.88%, while the HayCAM method reaches a value of 41.95%. The obtained results indicate that outputs derived using Principal Component Analysis (HayCAM) are better than those obtained using Singular Value Decomposition (EigenCAM).

Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri DergisiVol. 27(3)
Konya Technical University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Advanced Neural Network Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

HAYCAM VS EIGENCAM FOR WEAKLY-SUPERVISED OBJECT DETECTION ACROSS VARYING SCALES — Murat Ceylan, Ahmet Haydar Örnek · Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS