A Registry Study on Acetabular Revisions Using Jumbo Cups: Do We Really Need a More Complex Revision Strategy?
This registry-based study of JCs in revision THA demonstrates excellent 15-year survival rates and acceptable failure rates. It supports JCs as a viable option, offering relative surgical simplicity compared to alternatives like antiprotrusion cages, bone grafts, and augments.
Authors
- Claudio D’Agostino (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2616-0662)
- Barbara Bordini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6606-4950)
- Matteo Brunello (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9376-5480)
- Francesco Schilardi
- Giuseppe Geraci (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9640-5031)
- Piergiorgio Cataldi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5160-7064)
- Francesco Traina (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0196-101X)
- Alberto Di Martino (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0716-4951)
- Cesare Faldini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8152-4778)
Institutions
- Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (IT)
- Orthopedic Institute (US)
- University of Bologna (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Journal of Arthroplasty
- Published
- 2024-09-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.041
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.72