Escaping the Energy Poverty Trap: Policy Assessment

Abstract Climate change and the ongoing energy transition can increase energy poverty rates. To date, the main tool employed to alleviate energy poverty has involved income transfers to vulnerable households. However, measures that seek to improve a home’s energy efficiency have recently gained increasing relevance. In this study we assess the effectiveness of these two types of policy, assuming universal coverage and optimal behaviour. Results points that income transfers and energy efficiency measures have the potential to decrease the proportion of households in energy poverty; however, the magnitude of their respective effects differs greatly. The average impact of energy efficiency measures provides for a greater reduction in energy poverty rates than income transfer policies. Although the greatest reduction in energy poverty is obtained by combining both measures, this combination of tools leads to overlapping effects with income transfers making only a marginal contribution once total retrofit have been implemented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Resource Economics
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-024-00918-2
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Escaping the Energy Poverty Trap: Policy Assessment

Elisenda Jové‐Llopis, Elisa Trujillo-Baute
11 citations
Environmental and Resource Economics
Energy and Environment Impacts
1.46
article

Escaping the Energy Poverty Trap: Policy Assessment

Elisenda Jové‐Llopis, Elisa Trujillo-Baute
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Abstract Climate change and the ongoing energy transition can increase energy poverty rates. To date, the main tool employed to alleviate energy poverty has involved income transfers to vulnerable households. However, measures that seek to improve a home’s energy efficiency have recently gained increasing relevance. In this study we assess the effectiveness of these two types of policy, assuming universal coverage and optimal behaviour. Results points that income transfers and energy efficiency measures have the potential to decrease the proportion of households in energy poverty; however, the magnitude of their respective effects differs greatly. The average impact of energy efficiency measures provides for a greater reduction in energy poverty rates than income transfer policies. Although the greatest reduction in energy poverty is obtained by combining both measures, this combination of tools leads to overlapping effects with income transfers making only a marginal contribution once total retrofit have been implemented.

Environmental and Resource EconomicsVol. 87(12)
Universitat de Lleida (ES), Barcelona School of Economics (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Generalitat de Catalunya, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Universitat de Barcelona, Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca, European Regional Development Fund, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Energy and Environment Impacts
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.