Petrophysical Properties Estimation by Using Well Log and Core Data Interpretation for Tertiary Reservoir in Ajeel Oil Field

Understanding the petrophysical properties of reservoirs is paramount for assessing their characteristics and estimating the potential of oil-bearing formations. This study focuses on the tertiary reservoir in the Ajeel oil field, renowned for its heterogeneous carbonate nature and diverse production formations, including Jeribe, Dhiban, and Euphrates. The formation of the tertiary reservoir is evaluated through a comprehensive analysis of petrophysical properties utilizing well log data from well AJ-25 and core analysis data (routine and special analysis). The study reveals significant insights into the petrophysical properties of the formations. The effective porosity values for the Jeribe, Dhiban, and Euphrates formations are determined as 15.41%, 4.65%, and 9.85%, respectively, with lithology predominantly consisting of dolomite rock interspersed with limestone slices and anhydrite nodules. A high Secondary Porosity Index (SPI) indicates fractures. Archie's Parameters, obtained from a Pickett Plot, yield cement coefficient (m=1.8), saturation exponent (n=1.9), and tortuosity factor (a=1.19). Water saturation levels for the Jeribe, Dhiban, and Euphrates formations are 33%, 86%, and 81%, respectively, with porosity and water saturation cutoff values determined as 10% and 60%, respectively. Net to Gross of Jeribe, Dhiban, and Euphrates formation are 0.706, 0.029, and 0.011, respectively. Jeribe Formation is identified as an oil-bearing zone. In contrast, the Dhiban and Euphrates formations are identified as water-bearing zones. To enhance the accuracy of petrophysical assessments, modern well logging techniques, such as the Formation Micro Scanner log (FMI log), are recommended to investigate fractures and their impact on field performance, as traditional logs may not adequately capture these features. Additionally, our comparative analysis highlights superior petrophysical properties of the Euphrates Formation compared to the Jeribe Formation. Therefore, prioritizing drilling and completion activities in the Euphrates Reservoir within the field, contingent upon its positioning relative to the oil-water contact level, is suggested for optimizing reservoir performance.