Evaluation of Information Technology Governance Maturity Using COBIT 2019: A Case Study on the IT Security Industry

This study aims to evaluate the maturity of IT governance in the IT security industry using COBIT 2019. The assessment covered 13 COBIT 2019 domains, namely APO03—Managed Enterprise Architecture, APO07—Managed Human Resources, APO12—Managed Risk, APO13—Managed Security, APO14—Managed Data, BAI02—Managed Requirements Definition, BAI03—Managed Solutions Identification & Build, BAI05—Managed Organizational Change, BAI06—Managed IT Changes, BAI07—Managed IT Change Acceptance and Transitioning, BAI09—Managed Assets, BAI10—Managed Configuration, and BAI11—Managed Projects. The research methodology included observation, domain-based question formulation, RACI interviews, data collection, and question validation testing, with maturity calculation performed using appropriate formulas. Results indicate that most domains are at Level 2 (Managed), with significant contributions to maturity at Levels 3 and 4. Significant gaps were found between the current state and the desired maturity targets for many domains, such as APO03 and BAI03. The percentage contribution from Level 2 is the highest, while contributions from Levels 3 and 4 vary, with very low contributions from Level 5. The total maturity score is 2.49, with percentage contributions from Levels 2, 3, 4, and 5 being 74%, 26%, 11%, and 3%, respectively. Recommendations include improving processes to achieve Levels 3 and 4 across more domains and investing in training and development for relevant teams.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal La Multiapp
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37899/journallamultiapp.v5i4.1514
Primary Topic
Technology and Data Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Information Technology Governance Maturity Using COBIT 2019: A Case Study on the IT Security Industry

Richardus Eko Indrajit, Erick Dazki, Rachmad Syarul Hidayat
Journal La Multiapp
Technology and Data Analysis
article

Evaluation of Information Technology Governance Maturity Using COBIT 2019: A Case Study on the IT Security Industry

Richardus Eko Indrajit, Erick Dazki, Rachmad Syarul Hidayat
article en

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the maturity of IT governance in the IT security industry using COBIT 2019. The assessment covered 13 COBIT 2019 domains, namely APO03—Managed Enterprise Architecture, APO07—Managed Human Resources, APO12—Managed Risk, APO13—Managed Security, APO14—Managed Data, BAI02—Managed Requirements Definition, BAI03—Managed Solutions Identification & Build, BAI05—Managed Organizational Change, BAI06—Managed IT Changes, BAI07—Managed IT Change Acceptance and Transitioning, BAI09—Managed Assets, BAI10—Managed Configuration, and BAI11—Managed Projects. The research methodology included observation, domain-based question formulation, RACI interviews, data collection, and question validation testing, with maturity calculation performed using appropriate formulas. Results indicate that most domains are at Level 2 (Managed), with significant contributions to maturity at Levels 3 and 4. Significant gaps were found between the current state and the desired maturity targets for many domains, such as APO03 and BAI03. The percentage contribution from Level 2 is the highest, while contributions from Levels 3 and 4 vary, with very low contributions from Level 5. The total maturity score is 2.49, with percentage contributions from Levels 2, 3, 4, and 5 being 74%, 26%, 11%, and 3%, respectively. Recommendations include improving processes to achieve Levels 3 and 4 across more domains and investing in training and development for relevant teams.

Journal La MultiappVol. 5(4)
Universitas Pramita Indonesia (ID)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Technology and Data Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.