Housing customization: envisioning an interface to support co-design processes

Purpose There are several studies showing that end-users' participation in the architectural design process of houses is critical to their satisfaction (e.g. Önder et al., 2010; Ammar et al., 2013). Housing that is not adjusted to inhabitants' needs leads to modification works (Davidson et al., 2007) that could be avoided if their design was defined from the beginning with their participation. Digital technologies, such as 3D interactive visualization, benefit co-design processes by helping non-specialists better understand space and design possibilities (Salter et al., 2009; Schroth et al., 2006). However, the available literature shows that existing co-design digital tools were not developed based on potential users’ requirements. This paper aims to define the user requirements of a co-design tool for housing customization. Design/methodology/approach Interviews were conducted to gather information on how participatory processes occur in housing cooperatives and identify how potential users can collaborate in the design definition of their houses using a digital tool. Findings The interviews were analyzed, and requirements were defined. Originality/value This work contributes to the advancement of knowledge since the tool is defined based on requirements collected from potential end-users. By using a user-centered approach, the tool can contribute to more effective and informed collaboration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/arch-04-2024-0144
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Housing customization: envisioning an interface to support co-design processes

Micaela Raposo, Miguel Sales Dias, Sara Eloy
3 citations
International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR
Design Education and Practice
0.64
article

Housing customization: envisioning an interface to support co-design processes

Micaela Raposo, Miguel Sales Dias, Sara Eloy
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Purpose There are several studies showing that end-users' participation in the architectural design process of houses is critical to their satisfaction (e.g. Önder et al., 2010; Ammar et al., 2013). Housing that is not adjusted to inhabitants' needs leads to modification works (Davidson et al., 2007) that could be avoided if their design was defined from the beginning with their participation. Digital technologies, such as 3D interactive visualization, benefit co-design processes by helping non-specialists better understand space and design possibilities (Salter et al., 2009; Schroth et al., 2006). However, the available literature shows that existing co-design digital tools were not developed based on potential users’ requirements. This paper aims to define the user requirements of a co-design tool for housing customization. Design/methodology/approach Interviews were conducted to gather information on how participatory processes occur in housing cooperatives and identify how potential users can collaborate in the design definition of their houses using a digital tool. Findings The interviews were analyzed, and requirements were defined. Originality/value This work contributes to the advancement of knowledge since the tool is defined based on requirements collected from potential end-users. By using a user-centered approach, the tool can contribute to more effective and informed collaboration.

International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJARVol. 20(1)
University of Antwerp (BE), Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Design Education and Practice
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.