Validation of the vertical canopy cover profile products derived from GEDI over selected forest sites

Canopy cover (CC) quantifies the proportion of canopy materials projected vertically onto the ground surface. CC is a crucial canopy structural variable and is commonly used in many ecological and climatic models. The vertical CC profile product is currently available from the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI). However, detailed information about the accuracy and uncertainty of the GEDI vertical CC profile product remains limited. The objective of this study is to validate the GEDI CC product over selected forest sites using reference values derived from digital hemispherical photography (DHP), airborne laser scanning (ALS) point clouds, and simulated waveforms. The accuracy of CC was quantified and analyzed regarding GEDI observation conditions, waveform processing, and estimation methods. The results show that the total GEDI CC correlates well with those estimated from DHP, ALS, and simulated waveform data (r2 = 0.65, 0.71, and 0.71, respectively) but is systematically underestimated (bias = −0.05, −0.11, and −0.07, respectively) based on reference data. Compared with the ALS-estimated CC, needleleaf forest shows the highest correlation for vertical CC (r2 ≥ 0.65) and shrubland shows the lowest bias for total CC (bias = −0.13). The mean absolute error (MAE) of the GEDI CC decreases from 0.15 to 0.09 from the ground to 35 m. The total GEDI CCs derived from the waveform interpretation algorithms A2 and A6 display the highest r2 (≥ 0.6) and smallest RMSE (≤ 0.23) compared to those of the other algorithms. The GEDI CC was improved at moderate CC values using a canopy-to-background backscattering coefficient ratio () determined with the regression method. The CC accuracy increases with beam sensitivity and decreases with increasing canopy cover. The partial difference between GEDI CC and ALS CC is attributed to definition differences. Further improvement of the CC algorithm can be made by using vegetation-specific waveform processing algorithms and realistic values.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science of Remote Sensing
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2024.100158
Citations
19
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the vertical canopy cover profile products derived from GEDI over selected forest sites

Yunjia Wu, Tian Ma, Hongliang Fang, Yu Li et al.
19 citations
Science of Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
3.91
article

Validation of the vertical canopy cover profile products derived from GEDI over selected forest sites

Yunjia Wu, Tian Ma, Hongliang Fang, Yu Li, Hao Tang, Yao Wang, Sijia Li
article en
19 citations

Abstract

Canopy cover (CC) quantifies the proportion of canopy materials projected vertically onto the ground surface. CC is a crucial canopy structural variable and is commonly used in many ecological and climatic models. The vertical CC profile product is currently available from the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI). However, detailed information about the accuracy and uncertainty of the GEDI vertical CC profile product remains limited. The objective of this study is to validate the GEDI CC product over selected forest sites using reference values derived from digital hemispherical photography (DHP), airborne laser scanning (ALS) point clouds, and simulated waveforms. The accuracy of CC was quantified and analyzed regarding GEDI observation conditions, waveform processing, and estimation methods. The results show that the total GEDI CC correlates well with those estimated from DHP, ALS, and simulated waveform data (r2 = 0.65, 0.71, and 0.71, respectively) but is systematically underestimated (bias = −0.05, −0.11, and −0.07, respectively) based on reference data. Compared with the ALS-estimated CC, needleleaf forest shows the highest correlation for vertical CC (r2 ≥ 0.65) and shrubland shows the lowest bias for total CC (bias = −0.13). The mean absolute error (MAE) of the GEDI CC decreases from 0.15 to 0.09 from the ground to 35 m. The total GEDI CCs derived from the waveform interpretation algorithms A2 and A6 display the highest r2 (≥ 0.6) and smallest RMSE (≤ 0.23) compared to those of the other algorithms. The GEDI CC was improved at moderate CC values using a canopy-to-background backscattering coefficient ratio () determined with the regression method. The CC accuracy increases with beam sensitivity and decreases with increasing canopy cover. The partial difference between GEDI CC and ALS CC is attributed to definition differences. Further improvement of the CC algorithm can be made by using vegetation-specific waveform processing algorithms and realistic values.

Science of Remote SensingVol. 10
National University of Singapore (SG), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Science
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.