Farmers and their data: Evaluating the swiss conception of data sharing through the lens of digital farming

Digitalisation has changed agricultural production and will continue to do so. Although digital technology promises to increase the efficiency, productivity and environmental friendliness of agriculture while improving the work-life balance of farmers, new digital farming technologies come with potential negatives, such as privacy and security concerns. In recognition of that fact data is a fundamental part of digital adoption in the agricultural sector, this article analyses Swiss farmers perceptions of data sharing. We apply the Responsible Research on Innovation (RRI) approach to anticipate and discuss farmers' legal and political perspectives on agricultural data and data sharing. These form the foundation of and thus the key to digitalisation in agriculture. Based on a review of the literature and two exploratory interviews on the broader regulatory context of data sharing, Swiss data regulation and management were included as background to this work. This paper, further explores in detail the relationship between farmers' attitudes towards data sharing and their relatively low adoption of digital technologies. Such an analysis is valuable as it provides us with the farmers' perspective on data use and regulations in Switzerland which, though not an EU country, has its own high data-protection standards. More specifically, we assessed Swiss farmers’ perceptions of agricultural data sharing with public and private entities and placed these perceptions within the broader Swiss framework for data regulation. This was accomplished by a survey of 939 randomly selected farmers in the German- and French-speaking parts of Switzerland. From the Swiss farming perspective, we discuss how innovation can respond to societal needs. We conclude that the concerns, risks and vulnerabilities that Swiss famers are currently experiencing with regard to their farm data need to be addressed through a broader regulatory reform of Swiss agricultural data protection if digital farming is to achieve its full potential in Switzerland. • In digital agriculture, ever more data are being generated and shared by farmers with private providers and the government. • The absence of regulation of agricultural data is emphasized in this study. • Swiss farmers are aware of the value of their data but not of the terms of the data contracts and do not trust data privacy. • An imbalance of power exists between farmers and digital technology providers and between farmers and the government. • Regulatory issues must be addressed to ensure farmers can trust data management and fully realize digital farming's potential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103390
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Smart Cities and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Farmers and their data: Evaluating the swiss conception of data sharing through the lens of digital farming

Leanne Wiseman, Linda Reissig, Marianne Cockburn
7 citations
Journal of Rural Studies
Smart Cities and Technologies
2.24
article

Farmers and their data: Evaluating the swiss conception of data sharing through the lens of digital farming

Leanne Wiseman, Linda Reissig, Marianne Cockburn
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Digitalisation has changed agricultural production and will continue to do so. Although digital technology promises to increase the efficiency, productivity and environmental friendliness of agriculture while improving the work-life balance of farmers, new digital farming technologies come with potential negatives, such as privacy and security concerns. In recognition of that fact data is a fundamental part of digital adoption in the agricultural sector, this article analyses Swiss farmers perceptions of data sharing. We apply the Responsible Research on Innovation (RRI) approach to anticipate and discuss farmers' legal and political perspectives on agricultural data and data sharing. These form the foundation of and thus the key to digitalisation in agriculture. Based on a review of the literature and two exploratory interviews on the broader regulatory context of data sharing, Swiss data regulation and management were included as background to this work. This paper, further explores in detail the relationship between farmers' attitudes towards data sharing and their relatively low adoption of digital technologies. Such an analysis is valuable as it provides us with the farmers' perspective on data use and regulations in Switzerland which, though not an EU country, has its own high data-protection standards. More specifically, we assessed Swiss farmers’ perceptions of agricultural data sharing with public and private entities and placed these perceptions within the broader Swiss framework for data regulation. This was accomplished by a survey of 939 randomly selected farmers in the German- and French-speaking parts of Switzerland. From the Swiss farming perspective, we discuss how innovation can respond to societal needs. We conclude that the concerns, risks and vulnerabilities that Swiss famers are currently experiencing with regard to their farm data need to be addressed through a broader regulatory reform of Swiss agricultural data protection if digital farming is to achieve its full potential in Switzerland. • In digital agriculture, ever more data are being generated and shared by farmers with private providers and the government. • The absence of regulation of agricultural data is emphasized in this study. • Swiss farmers are aware of the value of their data but not of the terms of the data contracts and do not trust data privacy. • An imbalance of power exists between farmers and digital technology providers and between farmers and the government. • Regulatory issues must be addressed to ensure farmers can trust data management and fully realize digital farming's potential.

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 111
Griffith University (AU), Agroscope (CH), Institute for Sustainability (GB)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Smart Cities and Technologies
2.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.