TAXA DE FALHA DE PROTOCOLO UTILIZANDO A TÉCNICA ALL-ON-4: UMA REVISÃO NARRATIVA

Oral rehabilitation through dental implants is a fundamental solution for restoring the quality of life in edentulous patients and has been widely used due to its high success rates. The all-on-four concept combines two anterior axial implants and two posterior angled implants, making it a viable rehabilitation option for patients with severe bone loss, minimizing the complexity of the surgical procedure, and enabling immediate rehabilitation. Although it presents excellent success rates, it is important to understand the risk factors for implant survival failure. The aim of this work is to conduct a narrative review of the literature and, from it, analyze the failure rates of rehabilitations using the all-on-four protocol. The possible factors identified were gender, maxillary bone, smoking, presence of bruxism, systemic diseases, and previous periodontitis. The implant survival rate confirmed the high success rates of the technique, varying between 94% and 99%. Smoking was shown to be the main risk factor for failure, a variable present in all reviewed articles. The presence of bruxism also presented relevance, albeit more discreetly. The other factors did not show significant impact. It is concluded that there is a need for a greater number of randomized clinical trials with larger samples and long-term follow-up, as the current evidence is limited by the quality of available studies and the scarcity of data on longer clinical outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista fisio&terapia.
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69849/revistaft/pa10202408311051
Primary Topic
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TAXA DE FALHA DE PROTOCOLO UTILIZANDO A TÉCNICA ALL-ON-4: UMA REVISÃO NARRATIVA

Iara Dutra Ribeiro, Pedro Senna Witt, Flávia Vieira Genta, Shadia Mohamed Ali Al-Salamah et al.
Revista fisio&terapia.
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
article

TAXA DE FALHA DE PROTOCOLO UTILIZANDO A TÉCNICA ALL-ON-4: UMA REVISÃO NARRATIVA

Iara Dutra Ribeiro, Pedro Senna Witt, Flávia Vieira Genta, Shadia Mohamed Ali Al-Salamah, Felipe Van Santen, Douglas Eduardo dos Santos, Amanda Bortolin, Natan Lourenço Cunha, Bruna Bernardino Silva, Maria Eduarda Schiestl Melo
article en

Abstract

Oral rehabilitation through dental implants is a fundamental solution for restoring the quality of life in edentulous patients and has been widely used due to its high success rates. The all-on-four concept combines two anterior axial implants and two posterior angled implants, making it a viable rehabilitation option for patients with severe bone loss, minimizing the complexity of the surgical procedure, and enabling immediate rehabilitation. Although it presents excellent success rates, it is important to understand the risk factors for implant survival failure. The aim of this work is to conduct a narrative review of the literature and, from it, analyze the failure rates of rehabilitations using the all-on-four protocol. The possible factors identified were gender, maxillary bone, smoking, presence of bruxism, systemic diseases, and previous periodontitis. The implant survival rate confirmed the high success rates of the technique, varying between 94% and 99%. Smoking was shown to be the main risk factor for failure, a variable present in all reviewed articles. The presence of bruxism also presented relevance, albeit more discreetly. The other factors did not show significant impact. It is concluded that there is a need for a greater number of randomized clinical trials with larger samples and long-term follow-up, as the current evidence is limited by the quality of available studies and the scarcity of data on longer clinical outcomes.

Revista fisio&terapia.
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.