Understanding Constraints in Zero Budget Natural Farming: A Comparative Study of Two Districts in Northern Karnataka, India

The Green Revolution successfully achieved food security but also brought about new challenges, such as decreasing factor productivity and inefficient nutrient utilization. As concerns about food safety, environmental sustainability, and climate change continue to grow, Zero Budget Natural Farming (ZBNF) has emerged as an alternative and gained support from governments. This study aimed to identify the constraints of ZBNF in Northern Karnataka. Using an ex post facto research design, data were collected from 100 respondents in Belagavi and Haveri districts, categorized into planners and adopters. The Garrett Ranking Technique and Mann-Whitney U test were applied to analyze the constraints. Planners faced challenges, such as low initial yields (62.58) and a lack of confidence in using ZBNF inputs (59.54). However, adopters cited inadequate government support (53.96) as their top constraint. Both groups reported the labor-intensive nature of practicing ZBNF and issues with market access, highlighting systemic barriers to ZBNF adoption. Statistically significant differences were found between planners and adopters in terms of the non-availability of traditional seed varieties (p=0.012), low yields in the initial stages (p=0.030), lack of information on preparing asthras (p=0.024), and inadequate government support (p=0.015). Other constraints, such as purchasing indigenous cows (p=0.05) and intensive labor requirements (p=0.223), were identified but not statistically significant. These findings contribute to the sustainable agriculture discourse and offer insights for policymakers and practitioners aiming to promote ZBNF as a viable alternative to conventional farming.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Scientific Research and Reports
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i92362
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Constraints in Zero Budget Natural Farming: A Comparative Study of Two Districts in Northern Karnataka, India

H Gunashekhar, B. L. Manjunatha, Parashuram Kambale, Chethan Patil N. D. et al.
1 citations
Journal of Scientific Research and Reports
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
1.34
article

Understanding Constraints in Zero Budget Natural Farming: A Comparative Study of Two Districts in Northern Karnataka, India

H Gunashekhar, B. L. Manjunatha, Parashuram Kambale, Chethan Patil N. D., Meshram Pankaj Moreshwar, Arun C Kanagalabavi, Dayananda Patil, Sujeet Kumar Jha
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The Green Revolution successfully achieved food security but also brought about new challenges, such as decreasing factor productivity and inefficient nutrient utilization. As concerns about food safety, environmental sustainability, and climate change continue to grow, Zero Budget Natural Farming (ZBNF) has emerged as an alternative and gained support from governments. This study aimed to identify the constraints of ZBNF in Northern Karnataka. Using an ex post facto research design, data were collected from 100 respondents in Belagavi and Haveri districts, categorized into planners and adopters. The Garrett Ranking Technique and Mann-Whitney U test were applied to analyze the constraints. Planners faced challenges, such as low initial yields (62.58) and a lack of confidence in using ZBNF inputs (59.54). However, adopters cited inadequate government support (53.96) as their top constraint. Both groups reported the labor-intensive nature of practicing ZBNF and issues with market access, highlighting systemic barriers to ZBNF adoption. Statistically significant differences were found between planners and adopters in terms of the non-availability of traditional seed varieties (p=0.012), low yields in the initial stages (p=0.030), lack of information on preparing asthras (p=0.024), and inadequate government support (p=0.015). Other constraints, such as purchasing indigenous cows (p=0.05) and intensive labor requirements (p=0.223), were identified but not statistically significant. These findings contribute to the sustainable agriculture discourse and offer insights for policymakers and practitioners aiming to promote ZBNF as a viable alternative to conventional farming.

Journal of Scientific Research and ReportsVol. 30(9)
University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences (IN), Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
1.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.