Biomarker-enhanced cardiovascular risk prediction in patients with cancer: a prospective cohort study

Background: Continuously improving cancer-specific survival puts a growing proportion of cancer patients at risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), but tailored tools for cardiovascular risk prediction remain unavailable. Objectives: To assess a broad panel of cardiovascular biomarkers and risk factors for the prediction of MACE and cardiovascular death in cancer patients. Methods: In total, 2192 patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent cancer were followed prospectively for the occurrence of 2-year MACE and 5-year cardiovascular death. Univariable and multivariable risk models were fit to assess independent associations of cardiovascular risk factors and biomarkers with adverse outcomes, and a risk score was developed. Results: Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and selected cancer types were linked to higher MACE risk. While levels of Lp(a), CRP, and GDF-15 did not associate with MACE, levels of ICAM-1, P-/E-/L-selectins, and NT-proBNP were independently linked to 2-year MACE risk. A clinical risk score was derived, assigning +1 point for male sex, smoking, and age of ≥60 years and +2 points for atherosclerotic disease, yielding a bootstrapped C-statistic of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.71-0.81) for the prediction of 2-year MACE. Implementation of biomarker data conferred improved performance (0.83, 95% CI: 0.78-0.88), with a simplified model showing similar performance (0.80, 95% CI: 0.74-0.86). The biomarker-enhanced and simplified prediction models achieved a C-statistic of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.71-0.93) and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.64-0.83) for the prediction of 5-year cardiovascular death. Conclusion: Biomarker-enhanced risk prediction strategies allow the identification of cancer patients at high risk of MACE and cardiovascular death. While external validation studies are ongoing, this first-of-its-kind risk score may provide the basis for personalized cardiovascular risk assessment across cancer entities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2024.07.019
Citations
9
Primary Topic
GDF15 and Related Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biomarker-enhanced cardiovascular risk prediction in patients with cancer: a prospective cohort study

Ingrid Pabinger, Thomas Suter, Tetiana Lapikova-Bryhinska, Amedeo Tirandi et al.
9 citations
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
GDF15 and Related Biomarkers
4.23
article

Biomarker-enhanced cardiovascular risk prediction in patients with cancer: a prospective cohort study

Ingrid Pabinger, Thomas Suter, Tetiana Lapikova-Bryhinska, Amedeo Tirandi, Fabrizio Montecucco, Arnold von Eckardstein, Cornelia Englisch, Cihan Ay, Ella Grilz, Florian A. Wenzl, Simon Kraler, Davide Ramoni, Anna Lisa, Federica La Rosa, Stephan Nopp, Federico Carbone, Florian Moik, Luca Liberale, Alexander Akhmedov, Alessandro Scuricini, Aurora Gavoci, Federica Frè, Cristina Michelauz, Simone Isoppo, Curzia Tortorella, Thomas F. Lüscher
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Background: Continuously improving cancer-specific survival puts a growing proportion of cancer patients at risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), but tailored tools for cardiovascular risk prediction remain unavailable. Objectives: To assess a broad panel of cardiovascular biomarkers and risk factors for the prediction of MACE and cardiovascular death in cancer patients. Methods: In total, 2192 patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent cancer were followed prospectively for the occurrence of 2-year MACE and 5-year cardiovascular death. Univariable and multivariable risk models were fit to assess independent associations of cardiovascular risk factors and biomarkers with adverse outcomes, and a risk score was developed. Results: Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and selected cancer types were linked to higher MACE risk. While levels of Lp(a), CRP, and GDF-15 did not associate with MACE, levels of ICAM-1, P-/E-/L-selectins, and NT-proBNP were independently linked to 2-year MACE risk. A clinical risk score was derived, assigning +1 point for male sex, smoking, and age of ≥60 years and +2 points for atherosclerotic disease, yielding a bootstrapped C-statistic of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.71-0.81) for the prediction of 2-year MACE. Implementation of biomarker data conferred improved performance (0.83, 95% CI: 0.78-0.88), with a simplified model showing similar performance (0.80, 95% CI: 0.74-0.86). The biomarker-enhanced and simplified prediction models achieved a C-statistic of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.71-0.93) and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.64-0.83) for the prediction of 5-year cardiovascular death. Conclusion: Biomarker-enhanced risk prediction strategies allow the identification of cancer patients at high risk of MACE and cardiovascular death. While external validation studies are ongoing, this first-of-its-kind risk score may provide the basis for personalized cardiovascular risk assessment across cancer entities.

Journal of Thrombosis and HaemostasisVol. 22(11)
University of Bern (CH), King's College London (GB), Medical University of Graz (AT), University of Zurich (CH), University Hospital of Bern (CH), Harefield Hospital (GB), Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna (AT), University Hospital of Zurich (CH), Kantonsspital Baden (CH), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT), Imperial College London (GB), Medical University of Vienna (AT), University of Genoa (IT)
Foundation for Cardiovascular Research, Ministero della Salute, Gesellschaft für Thrombose- und Hämostaseforschung
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
GDF15 and Related Biomarkers
4.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.