The SAMI galaxy survey: on the importance of applying multiple selection criteria for finding Milky Way analogues

ABSTRACT Milky Way analogues (MWAs) provide an alternative insight into the various pathways that lead to the formation of disc galaxies with similar properties to the Milky Way (MW). In this study, we explore different selection techniques for identifying MWAs in the Sydney-AAO (Australian Astronomical Observatory) Multi-object Integral field spectrograph (SAMI) Galaxy Survey. We utilize a nearest neighbours method to define MWAs using four selection parameters including stellar mass ($M_{\star }$), star formation rate ($\rm SFR$), bulge-to-total ratio ($B/T$), and disc effective radius ($R_{\rm {e}}$). Based on 15 different selection combinations, we find that including $M_{\star }$ and SFR is essential for minimizing biases in the average MWA properties as compared to the MW. Furthermore, given the MW’s smaller than average size, selection combinations without $R_{\rm {e}}$ result in MWAs being too large. Lastly, we find that $B/T$ is the least important parameter out of the four tested parameters. Using all four selection criteria, we define the top 10 most MW-like galaxies in the GAMA and Cluster regions of the SAMI survey. These most MW-like galaxies are typically barred spirals, with kinematically cold rotating discs and reside in a wide range of environments. Surprisingly, we find no significant differences between the MWAs selected from the GAMA and Cluster regions. Our work highlights the importance of using multiple selection criteria for finding MWAs and also demonstrates potential biases in previous MWA studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2042
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The SAMI galaxy survey: on the importance of applying multiple selection criteria for finding Milky Way analogues

Andrei Ristea, Amelia Fraser-McKelvie, Sarah Casura, Joss Bland‐Hawthorn et al.
3 citations
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
0.99
article

The SAMI galaxy survey: on the importance of applying multiple selection criteria for finding Milky Way analogues

Andrei Ristea, Amelia Fraser-McKelvie, Sarah Casura, Joss Bland‐Hawthorn, Tayyaba Zafar, Sarah Brough, Jon Lawrence, Jesse van de Sande, S. M. Croom, Sarah M. Sweet, Julia J. Bryant, Stefania Barsanti, Sujeeporn Tuntipong
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Milky Way analogues (MWAs) provide an alternative insight into the various pathways that lead to the formation of disc galaxies with similar properties to the Milky Way (MW). In this study, we explore different selection techniques for identifying MWAs in the Sydney-AAO (Australian Astronomical Observatory) Multi-object Integral field spectrograph (SAMI) Galaxy Survey. We utilize a nearest neighbours method to define MWAs using four selection parameters including stellar mass ($M_{\star }$), star formation rate ($\rm SFR$), bulge-to-total ratio ($B/T$), and disc effective radius ($R_{\rm {e}}$). Based on 15 different selection combinations, we find that including $M_{\star }$ and SFR is essential for minimizing biases in the average MWA properties as compared to the MW. Furthermore, given the MW’s smaller than average size, selection combinations without $R_{\rm {e}}$ result in MWAs being too large. Lastly, we find that $B/T$ is the least important parameter out of the four tested parameters. Using all four selection criteria, we define the top 10 most MW-like galaxies in the GAMA and Cluster regions of the SAMI survey. These most MW-like galaxies are typically barred spirals, with kinematically cold rotating discs and reside in a wide range of environments. Surprisingly, we find no significant differences between the MWAs selected from the GAMA and Cluster regions. Our work highlights the importance of using multiple selection criteria for finding MWAs and also demonstrates potential biases in previous MWA studies.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 533(4)
Australian National University (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), European Southern Observatory (DE), The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), Australian Astronomical Observatory (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), ASTRO-3D (AU), ARC Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics (AU), International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Science and Technology Facilities Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
0.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.