Knowledge production and epistemic injustices

This article explores the complexities emerging from the knowing subject engaging in knowledge generation through artificial intelligence and digital technologies. By exploring a recent literature review as our case study, the possible existence of biases that may distort the studied reality and generate epistemic inequalities is investigated. A reflexive approach drawn from decolonial and feminist perspectives is applied. Findings underline the presence of epistemic biases, such as the invisibility of the knowing subject and knowledge representation, indicating that they are not simple isolated biases but part of a systemic problem that transcends specific scientific and technological practices. Ultimately, the complexity leading to epistemic biases is highlighted, encompassing interconnected systems, including the scientific, technological, and institutional.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MedieKultur Journal of media and communication research
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v40i76.143529
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge production and epistemic injustices

Ana Isabel Zermeño Flores, Thomas Tufte, Mabel Andrea Navarrete Vega
1 citations
MedieKultur Journal of media and communication research
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
1.13
article

Knowledge production and epistemic injustices

Ana Isabel Zermeño Flores, Thomas Tufte, Mabel Andrea Navarrete Vega
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article explores the complexities emerging from the knowing subject engaging in knowledge generation through artificial intelligence and digital technologies. By exploring a recent literature review as our case study, the possible existence of biases that may distort the studied reality and generate epistemic inequalities is investigated. A reflexive approach drawn from decolonial and feminist perspectives is applied. Findings underline the presence of epistemic biases, such as the invisibility of the knowing subject and knowledge representation, indicating that they are not simple isolated biases but part of a systemic problem that transcends specific scientific and technological practices. Ultimately, the complexity leading to epistemic biases is highlighted, encompassing interconnected systems, including the scientific, technological, and institutional.

MedieKultur Journal of media and communication researchVol. 40(76)
Loughborough University (GB), University of Johannesburg (ZA), Universidad de Colima (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.