Persistent low job control and subsequent major depression: A prospective cohort study of Australian working males

Workers' perception of control over work is a key construct in the relationship between the psychosocial work environment and health. While exposure to low job control has been prospectively linked to poor mental health including depression and anxiety, there is less research examining the impact of prolonged exposure to low job control on mental health. Data from 5054 employed men from 2013 to 2021 in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Male Health was used to examine persistent and intermittent low job control and subsequent major depression symptoms. Persistent low job control was based on consecutive self-reports of low job control over waves 1 and 2. Combinations of low and high job control were classified as intermittent exposure and continuous high job control exposure over both waves was classified as persistent high job control. Major depression symptoms, derived from the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, was measured in wave 3. Generalised linear models and augmented inverse probability weighting were undertaken. There was a strong stepwise relationship between low job control and major depression. Compared to persistent high job control, intermittent low job control was associated with an increased risk of subsequent major depression symptoms by 32% (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.82, 2.15); and persistent low job control by 103% (RR 2.03, 95% CI 1.21, 3.41). Compared to men exposed to persistent high job control, the average treatment effect for persistent low job control was 0.036 (95%CI 0.014, 0.058) and intermittent low job control 0.019 (95%CI 0.006, 0.032) equating to a risk ratio of 2.46 (95%CI 1.43, 3.50) and 1.79 (95% CI 1.14, 2.45) respectively. This study's findings have implications for public health and occupational policies, as they underscore the importance of reducing prolonged exposure to low job control to protect against the risk of major depression in the working population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science & Medicine
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117283
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Persistent low job control and subsequent major depression: A prospective cohort study of Australian working males

Anthony D. LaMontagne, Yamna Taouk, Tania King, Zoe Aitken
4 citations
Social Science & Medicine
Workplace Health and Well-being
3.40
article

Persistent low job control and subsequent major depression: A prospective cohort study of Australian working males

Anthony D. LaMontagne, Yamna Taouk, Tania King, Zoe Aitken
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Workers' perception of control over work is a key construct in the relationship between the psychosocial work environment and health. While exposure to low job control has been prospectively linked to poor mental health including depression and anxiety, there is less research examining the impact of prolonged exposure to low job control on mental health. Data from 5054 employed men from 2013 to 2021 in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Male Health was used to examine persistent and intermittent low job control and subsequent major depression symptoms. Persistent low job control was based on consecutive self-reports of low job control over waves 1 and 2. Combinations of low and high job control were classified as intermittent exposure and continuous high job control exposure over both waves was classified as persistent high job control. Major depression symptoms, derived from the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, was measured in wave 3. Generalised linear models and augmented inverse probability weighting were undertaken. There was a strong stepwise relationship between low job control and major depression. Compared to persistent high job control, intermittent low job control was associated with an increased risk of subsequent major depression symptoms by 32% (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.82, 2.15); and persistent low job control by 103% (RR 2.03, 95% CI 1.21, 3.41). Compared to men exposed to persistent high job control, the average treatment effect for persistent low job control was 0.036 (95%CI 0.014, 0.058) and intermittent low job control 0.019 (95%CI 0.006, 0.032) equating to a risk ratio of 2.46 (95%CI 1.43, 3.50) and 1.79 (95% CI 1.14, 2.45) respectively. This study's findings have implications for public health and occupational policies, as they underscore the importance of reducing prolonged exposure to low job control to protect against the risk of major depression in the working population.

Social Science & MedicineVol. 359
Deakin University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Melbourne Health (AU)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Workplace Health and Well-being
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.