Load Changes on a Short-Segment Posterior Instrumentation After Transosseous Disruption of L3 Vertebra – A Biomechanical Human Cadaveric Study

Study DesignBiomechanical Cadaveric Study.ObjectivesFollowing the successful use of a novel implantable sensor (Monitor) in evaluating the progression of fracture healing in long bones and posterolateral fusion of the spine based on implant load monitoring, the aim of this study was to investigate its potential to assess healing of transosseous fractures of a lumbar vertebra stabilized with a pedicle-screw-rod construct.MethodsSix human cadaveric spines were instrumented with pedicle screws and rods spanning L3 vertebra. The spine was loaded in Flexion-Extension (FE), Lateral-Bending (LB) and Axial-Rotation (AR) with an intact L3 vertebra and after its transosseous disruption, creating an AO B1 type fracture. The implant load was measured on the one rod using the Monitor and on the contralateral rod by strain gauges to validate the Monitor's measurements. In parallel, the range of motion (ROM) was assessed.ResultsROM increased significantly in all directions in the fractured model (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.049). The Monitor measured a significant increase in implant load in FE (<i>P</i> = 0.002) and LB (<i>P</i> = 0.045), however, not in AR. The strain gauge - aligned with the rod axis and glued onto its posterior side - detected an increased implant load not only in FE (<i>P</i> = 0.001) and LB (<i>P</i> = 0.016) but also in AR (<i>P</i> = 0.047).ConclusionAfter a complete transosseous disruption of L3 vertebra, the implant load on the rods was considerably higher vs the state with an intact vertebral body. Innovative implantable sensors could monitor those changes, allowing assessment of the healing progression based on quantifiable data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Spine Journal
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241282276
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Load Changes on a Short-Segment Posterior Instrumentation After Transosseous Disruption of L3 Vertebra – A Biomechanical Human Cadaveric Study

Boyko Gueorguiev, Maximilian Heumann, Alina Jacob, Lorin M. Benneker et al.
3 citations
Global Spine Journal
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
1.72
article

Load Changes on a Short-Segment Posterior Instrumentation After Transosseous Disruption of L3 Vertebra – A Biomechanical Human Cadaveric Study

Boyko Gueorguiev, Maximilian Heumann, Alina Jacob, Lorin M. Benneker, R. Geoff Richards
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Study DesignBiomechanical Cadaveric Study.ObjectivesFollowing the successful use of a novel implantable sensor (Monitor) in evaluating the progression of fracture healing in long bones and posterolateral fusion of the spine based on implant load monitoring, the aim of this study was to investigate its potential to assess healing of transosseous fractures of a lumbar vertebra stabilized with a pedicle-screw-rod construct.MethodsSix human cadaveric spines were instrumented with pedicle screws and rods spanning L3 vertebra. The spine was loaded in Flexion-Extension (FE), Lateral-Bending (LB) and Axial-Rotation (AR) with an intact L3 vertebra and after its transosseous disruption, creating an AO B1 type fracture. The implant load was measured on the one rod using the Monitor and on the contralateral rod by strain gauges to validate the Monitor's measurements. In parallel, the range of motion (ROM) was assessed.ResultsROM increased significantly in all directions in the fractured model (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.049). The Monitor measured a significant increase in implant load in FE (<i>P</i> = 0.002) and LB (<i>P</i> = 0.045), however, not in AR. The strain gauge - aligned with the rod axis and glued onto its posterior side - detected an increased implant load not only in FE (<i>P</i> = 0.001) and LB (<i>P</i> = 0.016) but also in AR (<i>P</i> = 0.047).ConclusionAfter a complete transosseous disruption of L3 vertebra, the implant load on the rods was considerably higher vs the state with an intact vertebral body. Innovative implantable sensors could monitor those changes, allowing assessment of the healing progression based on quantifiable data.

Global Spine JournalVol. 15(4)
University of Bern (CH), Universität Ulm (DE), AO Foundation (CH), Klinik Sonnenhof (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.