Impact of interaction technique in interactive data visualisations: A study on lookup, comparison, and relation-seeking tasks

This paper presents an analysis of different interaction techniques used in interactive data visualisations to support end-users in visual analytics tasks. Our selection of interaction techniques is based on prior work and consists of the interaction techniques Select , Explore , Reconfigure , Encode , Filter , Abstract/Elaborate , and Connect . Through a within-subject study, we assessed participants’ abilities to utilise these techniques when faced with three distinct types of data-driven tasks; lookup, comparison, and Relation-seeking. Our research investigates the impact of these interaction techniques on the correctness, confidence, perceived difficulty, and cognitive load of N = 80 self-identified data scientists and N = 80 non-experts. We find that interaction technique significantly impacts answer correctness and participant confidence. Participants performed best across those interaction techniques that allow for information that is deemed least relevant to be concealed, which is reflected in lower intrinsic and extraneous cognitive load. Interestingly, participants’ expertise affected their confidence but not their accuracy. Our results provide insights useful for a more targeted and informed design and usage of interactive data visualisations. • We present an analysis of seven interaction techniques as used for data analytics. • Interaction technique significantly impacts correctness and participant confidence. • Enabling users to conceal information increases performance and lowers cognitive load.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103359
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Data Visualization and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of interaction technique in interactive data visualisations: A study on lookup, comparison, and relation-seeking tasks

Benjamin Tag, Niels van Berkel, Helen C. Purchase, Daniel Buschek et al.
7 citations
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Data Visualization and Analytics
1.74
article

Impact of interaction technique in interactive data visualisations: A study on lookup, comparison, and relation-seeking tasks

Benjamin Tag, Niels van Berkel, Helen C. Purchase, Daniel Buschek, Rune Møberg Jacobsen, Daniel Russo
article en
7 citations

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of different interaction techniques used in interactive data visualisations to support end-users in visual analytics tasks. Our selection of interaction techniques is based on prior work and consists of the interaction techniques Select , Explore , Reconfigure , Encode , Filter , Abstract/Elaborate , and Connect . Through a within-subject study, we assessed participants’ abilities to utilise these techniques when faced with three distinct types of data-driven tasks; lookup, comparison, and Relation-seeking. Our research investigates the impact of these interaction techniques on the correctness, confidence, perceived difficulty, and cognitive load of N = 80 self-identified data scientists and N = 80 non-experts. We find that interaction technique significantly impacts answer correctness and participant confidence. Participants performed best across those interaction techniques that allow for information that is deemed least relevant to be concealed, which is reflected in lower intrinsic and extraneous cognitive load. Interestingly, participants’ expertise affected their confidence but not their accuracy. Our results provide insights useful for a more targeted and informed design and usage of interactive data visualisations. • We present an analysis of seven interaction techniques as used for data analytics. • Interaction technique significantly impacts correctness and participant confidence. • Enabling users to conceal information increases performance and lowers cognitive load.

International Journal of Human-Computer StudiesVol. 192
University of Bayreuth (DE), Monash University (AU), Aalborg University (DK)
Carlsbergfondet
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Data Visualization and Analytics
1.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.