Differing associations of PM2.5 exposure with systolic and diastolic blood pressures across exposure durations in a predominantly non-Hispanic Black cohort

Environmental health research has suggested that fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) exposure can lead to high blood pressures, but it is unclear whether the impacts remain the same for systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP). This study aimed to examine whether the effects of PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure on SBP and DBP differ using data from a predominantly non-Hispanic Black cohort collected between 2013 and 2019 in the US. PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure was assessed based on a satellite-derived model across exposure durations from 1 to 36 months. The average PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure level was between 9.5 and 9.8 μg/m<sup>3</sup> from 1 through 36 months. Mixed effects models were used to estimate the association of PM<sub>2.5</sub> with SBP, DBP, and related hypertension types, adjusted for potential confounders. A total of 6381 participants were included. PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure was positively associated with both SBP and DBP. The association magnitudes depended on exposure durations. The association with SBP was null at the 1-month duration (β = 0.05, 95% CI: - 0.23, 0.33), strengthened as duration increased, and plateaued at the 24-month duration (β = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.54, 1.73). The association with DBP started with β = 0.29 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.47) at the 1-month duration, and plateaued at the 12-month duration (β = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.23, 1.99). PM<sub>2.5</sub> was associated with isolated diastolic hypertension (12-month duration: odds ratio = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.34) and systolic-diastolic hypertension (12-month duration: odds ratio = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.26), but not with isolated systolic hypertension. The findings suggest DBP is more sensitive to PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and support differing effects of PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure on SBP and DBP. As elevation of SBP and DBP differentially predict CVD outcomes, this finding is relevant for prevention and treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-64851-6
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differing associations of PM2.5 exposure with systolic and diastolic blood pressures across exposure durations in a predominantly non-Hispanic Black cohort

Jayant M. Pinto, Jiajun Luo, Briseis Aschebrook‐Kilfoy, Tamar S. Polonsky et al.
4 citations
Scientific Reports
Air Quality and Health Impacts
1.26
article

Differing associations of PM2.5 exposure with systolic and diastolic blood pressures across exposure durations in a predominantly non-Hispanic Black cohort

Jayant M. Pinto, Jiajun Luo, Briseis Aschebrook‐Kilfoy, Tamar S. Polonsky, Karen Kim, Rena R. Jones, Christopher O. Olopade, Zhihao Jin, Habibul Ahsan
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Environmental health research has suggested that fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) exposure can lead to high blood pressures, but it is unclear whether the impacts remain the same for systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP). This study aimed to examine whether the effects of PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure on SBP and DBP differ using data from a predominantly non-Hispanic Black cohort collected between 2013 and 2019 in the US. PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure was assessed based on a satellite-derived model across exposure durations from 1 to 36 months. The average PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure level was between 9.5 and 9.8 μg/m<sup>3</sup> from 1 through 36 months. Mixed effects models were used to estimate the association of PM<sub>2.5</sub> with SBP, DBP, and related hypertension types, adjusted for potential confounders. A total of 6381 participants were included. PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure was positively associated with both SBP and DBP. The association magnitudes depended on exposure durations. The association with SBP was null at the 1-month duration (β = 0.05, 95% CI: - 0.23, 0.33), strengthened as duration increased, and plateaued at the 24-month duration (β = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.54, 1.73). The association with DBP started with β = 0.29 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.47) at the 1-month duration, and plateaued at the 12-month duration (β = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.23, 1.99). PM<sub>2.5</sub> was associated with isolated diastolic hypertension (12-month duration: odds ratio = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.34) and systolic-diastolic hypertension (12-month duration: odds ratio = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.26), but not with isolated systolic hypertension. The findings suggest DBP is more sensitive to PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and support differing effects of PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure on SBP and DBP. As elevation of SBP and DBP differentially predict CVD outcomes, this finding is relevant for prevention and treatment.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Emory University (US), Chicago Department of Public Health (US), University of Chicago (US), National Cancer Institute (US), Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics
National Institutes of Health, University of Chicago Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago Medical Center
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
1.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.