Artificial intelligence-assisted criminal justice reporting: An exploratory study of benefits, concerns, and future directions

This research explores the potential of large language models (LLMs) in revolutionizing report-writing practices across the criminal justice system. Drawing on insights from 23 interviews with justice professionals regarding report writing and LLM utilization, the benefits, challenges, and implications of integrating artificial intelligence (AI) technologies into the writing process are investigated. The findings highlight the obstacles to generating quality reports and the prevalence of boilerplate elements in justice system narratives, suggesting an opportunity for LLMs to streamline the writing process, provide training support, aid interoperability, and ensure consistency in standard sections. Practitioners voiced concern regarding the potential removal of human oversight, discretion, nuanced understanding, and privacy when weighing LLM adoption. Recommendations for practice and policy are offered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Criminology & Criminal Justice
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958241274296
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence-assisted criminal justice reporting: An exploratory study of benefits, concerns, and future directions

Melissa Inglis, Carl Dement
6 citations
Criminology & Criminal Justice
Artificial Intelligence in Law
13.39
article

Artificial intelligence-assisted criminal justice reporting: An exploratory study of benefits, concerns, and future directions

Melissa Inglis, Carl Dement
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This research explores the potential of large language models (LLMs) in revolutionizing report-writing practices across the criminal justice system. Drawing on insights from 23 interviews with justice professionals regarding report writing and LLM utilization, the benefits, challenges, and implications of integrating artificial intelligence (AI) technologies into the writing process are investigated. The findings highlight the obstacles to generating quality reports and the prevalence of boilerplate elements in justice system narratives, suggesting an opportunity for LLMs to streamline the writing process, provide training support, aid interoperability, and ensure consistency in standard sections. Practitioners voiced concern regarding the potential removal of human oversight, discretion, nuanced understanding, and privacy when weighing LLM adoption. Recommendations for practice and policy are offered.

Criminology & Criminal Justice
University of Central Oklahoma (US), University of Oklahoma (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Artificial Intelligence in Law
13.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.