Comparative Evaluation of K-Means, Hierarchical Clustering, and DBSCAN in Blood Donor Segmentation

Clustering techniques are pivotal in the fields of data analysis and pattern recognition, offering significant insights by grouping data points with similar characteristics. This study aims to perform a comprehensive comparison of three widely used clustering algorithms—K-Means, Hierarchical Clustering, and DBSCAN—on a dataset of blood donors. The objective is to determine which algorithm achieves the most precise and effective clustering of the data, taking into account factors such as donor location, blood type, and donation frequency. The study presents a novel approach by integrating a web-based platform that allows blood donors to register online. This platform not only facilitates the real-time updating of the dataset but also enhances the overall relevance and applicability of the clustering model by continuously incorporating new data entries. By leveraging such a dynamic dataset, the clustering algorithms can adapt to evolving patterns and trends, ensuring more accurate and meaningful insights over time.To rigorously evaluate the performance of each clustering method, several well-established metrics are employed, including the Silhouette Score, which assesses how similar each data point is to its own cluster compared to other clusters; the Davies-Bouldin Index, which evaluates the average similarity ratio of each cluster with its most similar cluster; and the Calinski-Harabasz Index, which measures the ratio of the sum of between-clusters dispersion and of within-cluster dispersion for all clusters. The results of this study indicate that the K-Means algorithm consistently outperforms both Hierarchical Clustering and DBSCAN in terms of accuracy and the clarity of cluster definitions. The findings underscore the robustness of K-Means for applications involving blood donor data, where capturing precise donor groupings can have substantial implications for healthcare logistics and resource allocation. These insights pave the way for further research into the optimization of clustering techniques in dynamic datasets and their practical applications in medical and other domains.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i04.26755
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Blood donation and transfusion practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of K-Means, Hierarchical Clustering, and DBSCAN in Blood Donor Segmentation

P. Priyadharshini, S. Srilekha, M - Adhilakshmi.
1 citations
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Blood donation and transfusion practices
0.73
article

Comparative Evaluation of K-Means, Hierarchical Clustering, and DBSCAN in Blood Donor Segmentation

P. Priyadharshini, S. Srilekha, M - Adhilakshmi.
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Clustering techniques are pivotal in the fields of data analysis and pattern recognition, offering significant insights by grouping data points with similar characteristics. This study aims to perform a comprehensive comparison of three widely used clustering algorithms—K-Means, Hierarchical Clustering, and DBSCAN—on a dataset of blood donors. The objective is to determine which algorithm achieves the most precise and effective clustering of the data, taking into account factors such as donor location, blood type, and donation frequency. The study presents a novel approach by integrating a web-based platform that allows blood donors to register online. This platform not only facilitates the real-time updating of the dataset but also enhances the overall relevance and applicability of the clustering model by continuously incorporating new data entries. By leveraging such a dynamic dataset, the clustering algorithms can adapt to evolving patterns and trends, ensuring more accurate and meaningful insights over time.To rigorously evaluate the performance of each clustering method, several well-established metrics are employed, including the Silhouette Score, which assesses how similar each data point is to its own cluster compared to other clusters; the Davies-Bouldin Index, which evaluates the average similarity ratio of each cluster with its most similar cluster; and the Calinski-Harabasz Index, which measures the ratio of the sum of between-clusters dispersion and of within-cluster dispersion for all clusters. The results of this study indicate that the K-Means algorithm consistently outperforms both Hierarchical Clustering and DBSCAN in terms of accuracy and the clarity of cluster definitions. The findings underscore the robustness of K-Means for applications involving blood donor data, where capturing precise donor groupings can have substantial implications for healthcare logistics and resource allocation. These insights pave the way for further research into the optimization of clustering techniques in dynamic datasets and their practical applications in medical and other domains.

International Journal For Multidisciplinary ResearchVol. 6(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Blood donation and transfusion practices
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Evaluation of K-Means, Hierarchical Clustering, and DBSCAN in Blood Donor Segmentation — P. Priyadharshini, S. Srilekha, et al. · International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS