Unfolding IoT Adoption: A Status Quo Bias Perspective

Abstract Internet of Things (IoT) solutions are still far from using their enormous potential, partly because misconceptions lead employees to avoid using IoT solutions and stick to established working routines. To shed light on the non-rational perspective of users, which allows for inference on the emergence of cognitive misconceptions, 489 respondents' perceptions of benefits and costs of IoT solutions were analyzed. Using the perspective of “status quo bias”, the qualitative analysis reveals that the perceptions of experienced and inexperienced users partly overlap on benefits such as the reduction of errors and relief of personnel. However, the perceptions also diverge in part, as inexperienced users consider IoT solutions to be gimmicky, fostering mistrust. In addition, inexperienced users overestimate learning phases for interacting with IoT solutions, leading to loss aversion and consequently to cognitive misperceptions. Hence, the study examines the gap between experienced and inexperienced users as a neglected aspect in IoT adoption. Further, identifying relevant drivers for the implementation of IoT solutions at the individual level helps to extend the hitherto technical view of IoT solutions towards a multi-layer approach that includes a holistic, behavioral perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business & Information Systems Engineering
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-024-00891-6
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unfolding IoT Adoption: A Status Quo Bias Perspective

Jutta Stumpf-Wollersheim, Alexander Richter, Marlen Rimbeck
3 citations
Business & Information Systems Engineering
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
3.15
article

Unfolding IoT Adoption: A Status Quo Bias Perspective

Jutta Stumpf-Wollersheim, Alexander Richter, Marlen Rimbeck
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Internet of Things (IoT) solutions are still far from using their enormous potential, partly because misconceptions lead employees to avoid using IoT solutions and stick to established working routines. To shed light on the non-rational perspective of users, which allows for inference on the emergence of cognitive misconceptions, 489 respondents' perceptions of benefits and costs of IoT solutions were analyzed. Using the perspective of “status quo bias”, the qualitative analysis reveals that the perceptions of experienced and inexperienced users partly overlap on benefits such as the reduction of errors and relief of personnel. However, the perceptions also diverge in part, as inexperienced users consider IoT solutions to be gimmicky, fostering mistrust. In addition, inexperienced users overestimate learning phases for interacting with IoT solutions, leading to loss aversion and consequently to cognitive misperceptions. Hence, the study examines the gap between experienced and inexperienced users as a neglected aspect in IoT adoption. Further, identifying relevant drivers for the implementation of IoT solutions at the individual level helps to extend the hitherto technical view of IoT solutions towards a multi-layer approach that includes a holistic, behavioral perspective.

Business & Information Systems EngineeringVol. 67(6)
Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), TU Bergakademie Freiberg (DE)
Victoria University of Wellington
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
3.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.