Exploring versatile applications of a vacuum-assisted bone harvester in orthopedic surgery

The vacuum-assisted bone harvester was effectively utilized in a wide range of debridement and curettage procedures across diverse orthopedic surgeries. In oncology cases, the device enabled effective tissue removal with comparable recurrence rates, demonstrating its potential to minimize contamination while preserving tissue for accurate diagnoses. Additionally, a high rate of osteomyelitis eradication was observed in debridement for primary infection cases (85%). Despite the relatively high reoperation rate of 47.7%, it is crucial to interpret this figure within the context of the varied reasons for reoperation. Many of these reoperations were planned as part of a staged approach to treatment or were unrelated to the device's performance. It is crucial to acknowledge that isolating the device's contribution to these results can be difficult. The utilization of the device should be guided by considerations of cost-effectiveness and patient-specific risk factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07786-3
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring versatile applications of a vacuum-assisted bone harvester in orthopedic surgery

Malcolm R. DeBaun, Jason A. Somarelli, William C. Eward, Brian E. Brigman et al.
2 citations
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
1.15
article

Exploring versatile applications of a vacuum-assisted bone harvester in orthopedic surgery

Malcolm R. DeBaun, Jason A. Somarelli, William C. Eward, Brian E. Brigman, Kevin A. Wu, Elizabeth Sachs, Julia D. Visgauss, Christian A. Péan, Devika A Shenoy
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The vacuum-assisted bone harvester was effectively utilized in a wide range of debridement and curettage procedures across diverse orthopedic surgeries. In oncology cases, the device enabled effective tissue removal with comparable recurrence rates, demonstrating its potential to minimize contamination while preserving tissue for accurate diagnoses. Additionally, a high rate of osteomyelitis eradication was observed in debridement for primary infection cases (85%). Despite the relatively high reoperation rate of 47.7%, it is crucial to interpret this figure within the context of the varied reasons for reoperation. Many of these reoperations were planned as part of a staged approach to treatment or were unrelated to the device's performance. It is crucial to acknowledge that isolating the device's contribution to these results can be difficult. The utilization of the device should be guided by considerations of cost-effectiveness and patient-specific risk factors.

BMC Musculoskeletal DisordersVol. 25(1)
Duke University (US), Duke University Hospital (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring versatile applications of a vacuum-assisted bone harvester in orthopedic surgery — Malcolm R. DeBaun, Jason A. Somarelli, et al. · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS