Institutionalization of Inclusive Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Instruments for the Performance Challenge Fund (PCF) Program

The premise of this paper is to campaign for the inclusion of project beneficiaries or inclusion of the voice of the people when doing Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) of LGU projects funded by the Performance Challenge Fund (PCF) program. For the DILG validators to be the bridge in promoting transparent and effective local governance thru an efficient monitoring and evaluation approach. The focus is mainly on the enhancement and development and eventual use of the PCF Program Management Office (PMO) of an inclusive M&E instruments for results-based LGU performance assessment and of using participatory methods such as the Most Significant Change (MSC) technique as part of the agenda to cascade and implement the M&E process through the two (2) project stakeholders, namely the PCF LGU beneficiaries and the community. Recommendations from this study intends to institutionalize instruments to change or address the very donor and government-centric approach to M&E to include a citizen-centric M&E towards an inclusive PCF program management.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i04.26335
Primary Topic
Education Systems and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutionalization of Inclusive Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Instruments for the Performance Challenge Fund (PCF) Program

Joselito S. Magumun -
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Education Systems and Policy
article

Institutionalization of Inclusive Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Instruments for the Performance Challenge Fund (PCF) Program

Joselito S. Magumun -
article en

Abstract

The premise of this paper is to campaign for the inclusion of project beneficiaries or inclusion of the voice of the people when doing Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) of LGU projects funded by the Performance Challenge Fund (PCF) program. For the DILG validators to be the bridge in promoting transparent and effective local governance thru an efficient monitoring and evaluation approach. The focus is mainly on the enhancement and development and eventual use of the PCF Program Management Office (PMO) of an inclusive M&E instruments for results-based LGU performance assessment and of using participatory methods such as the Most Significant Change (MSC) technique as part of the agenda to cascade and implement the M&E process through the two (2) project stakeholders, namely the PCF LGU beneficiaries and the community. Recommendations from this study intends to institutionalize instruments to change or address the very donor and government-centric approach to M&E to include a citizen-centric M&E towards an inclusive PCF program management.

International Journal For Multidisciplinary ResearchVol. 6(4)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Education Systems and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Institutionalization of Inclusive Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Instruments for the Performance Challenge Fund (PCF) Program — Joselito S. Magumun - · International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS