Comparison of Peri-implant Strain on Loading, between Splinted, Nonsplinted, Cement-retained and Screw-retained Implant-supported Prostheses: An In Vitro Study

Background and objectives: The present <i>in vitro</i> study was done to measure and compare peri-implant strain generated by different types of prostheses, namely, cement-retained splinted, cement-retained nonsplinted, screw-retained splinted and screw-retained nonsplinted with the help of strain gauges in polyurethane mandibular model under loading. Materials and methods: Implants were placed in two polyurethane mandibular models in first and second molar regions. Four different types of prostheses were made. Cement-retained splinted and cement-retained nonsplinted prostheses were fabricated on one model. Screw-retained splinted and screw-retained nonsplinted are fabricated on another model. Strain gauges are attached on the buccal and lingual sides of each implant. Metal jigs were fabricated for simultaneous load application during vertical and oblique loading. A static load of 400 N was applied to the central fossae region of both molars using the universal testing machine to test vertical loading. The load was applied at 30° to the crown to test oblique loading. For every model, a load was applied 15 times, and the peri-implant strain was recorded. Results: On vertical loading, the mean peri-implant strain (±SD) generated was found to be highest in nonsplinted screw-retained (1211.50 ± 65.28 microstrains and 1009.1 ± 42.06 macrostrains) and least in splinted cement-retained (630.70 ± 31.98 microstrains and 519.60 ± 32.48 microstrains) in the first molar region and second molar region, respectively. On oblique loading, the mean peri-implant strain (±SD) generated was found to be highest in nonsplinted screw-retained (702.47 ± 31.47 microstrains and 565.00 ± 16.11 microstrains) and least in splinted cement-retained (396.33 ± 27.04 microstrains and 302.47 ± 36.19 microstrains) in both 1st and 2nd molars, respectively. Conclusion: Splinted crowns produce less peri-implant strain when compared with nonsplinted crowns. Cement-retained prosthesis produces less strain when compared with screw-retained prosthesis. The least peri-implant strain was observed in splinted cement-retained crowns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dental Journal of Advance Studies
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5005/djas-11014-0043
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Peri-implant Strain on Loading, between Splinted, Nonsplinted, Cement-retained and Screw-retained Implant-supported Prostheses: An In Vitro Study

Jinsa P Devassy, Jimmy George, Saranya Ravikumar, Lithiya Susan John et al.
Dental Journal of Advance Studies
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Comparison of Peri-implant Strain on Loading, between Splinted, Nonsplinted, Cement-retained and Screw-retained Implant-supported Prostheses: An In Vitro Study

Jinsa P Devassy, Jimmy George, Saranya Ravikumar, Lithiya Susan John, Anu A Ali, Byju Paul Kurian
article en

Abstract

Background and objectives: The present <i>in vitro</i> study was done to measure and compare peri-implant strain generated by different types of prostheses, namely, cement-retained splinted, cement-retained nonsplinted, screw-retained splinted and screw-retained nonsplinted with the help of strain gauges in polyurethane mandibular model under loading. Materials and methods: Implants were placed in two polyurethane mandibular models in first and second molar regions. Four different types of prostheses were made. Cement-retained splinted and cement-retained nonsplinted prostheses were fabricated on one model. Screw-retained splinted and screw-retained nonsplinted are fabricated on another model. Strain gauges are attached on the buccal and lingual sides of each implant. Metal jigs were fabricated for simultaneous load application during vertical and oblique loading. A static load of 400 N was applied to the central fossae region of both molars using the universal testing machine to test vertical loading. The load was applied at 30° to the crown to test oblique loading. For every model, a load was applied 15 times, and the peri-implant strain was recorded. Results: On vertical loading, the mean peri-implant strain (±SD) generated was found to be highest in nonsplinted screw-retained (1211.50 ± 65.28 microstrains and 1009.1 ± 42.06 macrostrains) and least in splinted cement-retained (630.70 ± 31.98 microstrains and 519.60 ± 32.48 microstrains) in the first molar region and second molar region, respectively. On oblique loading, the mean peri-implant strain (±SD) generated was found to be highest in nonsplinted screw-retained (702.47 ± 31.47 microstrains and 565.00 ± 16.11 microstrains) and least in splinted cement-retained (396.33 ± 27.04 microstrains and 302.47 ± 36.19 microstrains) in both 1st and 2nd molars, respectively. Conclusion: Splinted crowns produce less peri-implant strain when compared with nonsplinted crowns. Cement-retained prosthesis produces less strain when compared with screw-retained prosthesis. The least peri-implant strain was observed in splinted cement-retained crowns.

Dental Journal of Advance StudiesVol. 12(2)
SRM Dental College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.