Recommendation System for Determining the Best Banner Supplier Using Profile Matching and TOPSIS Methods

Background: Choosing a banner supplier is a significant challenge for digital printing companies due to the various advantages offered by each supplier, often leading to selections based on subjective aspects such as price and quality. Objective: This research aims to develop a system that determines the best banner supplier to minimize production inefficiencies and maximize profits by comparing two calculation methods, Profile Matching and TOPSIS. Methods: A quantitative study was conducted using transaction data from the last six months. The parameter criteria used in this system include price, quality, delivery, availability, and payment terms. The study compares the effectiveness of Profile Matching and TOPSIS methods in identifying the best supplier. Results: The study results show that the TOPSIS method is superior, yielding 100% accuracy, 84% recall, and a 92% F1-score, outperforming the Profile Matching method. This demonstrates that the correct method and algorithm effectively provide the best alternative recommendations. Conclusion: The results indicate that using the TOPSIS method leads to more accurate and objective decisions based on predetermined criteria. The findings suggest that further research should focus on refining these methods to enhance decision-making in supplier selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
INTENSIF Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Penerapan Teknologi Sistem Informasi
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29407/intensif.v8i2.21635
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recommendation System for Determining the Best Banner Supplier Using Profile Matching and TOPSIS Methods

Hewa Majeed Zangana, Anastasia Lidya Maukar, Anik Vega Vitianingsih, Slamet Kacung et al.
5 citations
INTENSIF Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Penerapan Teknologi Sistem Informasi
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
2.45
article

Recommendation System for Determining the Best Banner Supplier Using Profile Matching and TOPSIS Methods

Hewa Majeed Zangana, Anastasia Lidya Maukar, Anik Vega Vitianingsih, Slamet Kacung, Deden Firmansyah
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Background: Choosing a banner supplier is a significant challenge for digital printing companies due to the various advantages offered by each supplier, often leading to selections based on subjective aspects such as price and quality. Objective: This research aims to develop a system that determines the best banner supplier to minimize production inefficiencies and maximize profits by comparing two calculation methods, Profile Matching and TOPSIS. Methods: A quantitative study was conducted using transaction data from the last six months. The parameter criteria used in this system include price, quality, delivery, availability, and payment terms. The study compares the effectiveness of Profile Matching and TOPSIS methods in identifying the best supplier. Results: The study results show that the TOPSIS method is superior, yielding 100% accuracy, 84% recall, and a 92% F1-score, outperforming the Profile Matching method. This demonstrates that the correct method and algorithm effectively provide the best alternative recommendations. Conclusion: The results indicate that using the TOPSIS method leads to more accurate and objective decisions based on predetermined criteria. The findings suggest that further research should focus on refining these methods to enhance decision-making in supplier selection.

INTENSIF Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Penerapan Teknologi Sistem InformasiVol. 8(2)
President University (ID), Duhok Polytechnic University (IQ), Universitas Dr. Soetomo (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
2.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.