Development and validation of the individual teamwork behaviors questionnaire

Although there has been significant research investigating the processes that facilitate how individuals work collectively as a team, there has been little attention to the specific behaviors that individual team members need to exhibit to support teamwork. Despite two such measures currently existing in the literature, both suffer from a few important limitations, which makes it difficult to ensure individual team members are contributing to the team and targeted for the most appropriate developmental efforts. Through a series of studies, we inductively develop the dimensions for such a measure, establish its convergent and discriminant validity against an established peer-evaluated measure, and then show how it fits in the nomological network of established teamwork measures. The resulting measure supports the strengths of a multi-source, peer-rated scale by capturing observable behaviors that can more clearly be evaluated by fellow group members and which are applicable to various organizational environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302241267986
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of the individual teamwork behaviors questionnaire

John W. Michel, Dave Luvison
1 citations
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
Team Dynamics and Performance
0.64
article

Development and validation of the individual teamwork behaviors questionnaire

John W. Michel, Dave Luvison
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Although there has been significant research investigating the processes that facilitate how individuals work collectively as a team, there has been little attention to the specific behaviors that individual team members need to exhibit to support teamwork. Despite two such measures currently existing in the literature, both suffer from a few important limitations, which makes it difficult to ensure individual team members are contributing to the team and targeted for the most appropriate developmental efforts. Through a series of studies, we inductively develop the dimensions for such a measure, establish its convergent and discriminant validity against an established peer-evaluated measure, and then show how it fits in the nomological network of established teamwork measures. The resulting measure supports the strengths of a multi-source, peer-rated scale by capturing observable behaviors that can more clearly be evaluated by fellow group members and which are applicable to various organizational environments.

Group Processes & Intergroup RelationsVol. 28(2)
Loyola University Maryland (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Team Dynamics and Performance
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Development and validation of the individual teamwork behaviors questionnaire — John W. Michel, Dave Luvison · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS