Sustainable agricultural technologies of the future: Determination of adoption readiness for different consumer groups

The rapid increase in population and unsustainable agricultural practices has significantly damaged the environment. Our study explores how to achieve food security through environmentally friendly methods such as controlled environment agriculture (CEA), genetic editing (GE), and farming automation (FA), with an emphasis on the importance of consumer acceptance of these technologies. Analyzing data from 2138 Australians and 1760 New Zealanders, we employ a two-step clustering method—(1) hierarchical clustering and (2) k-means clustering—to categorize consumers on the basis of their demographic and lifestyle preferences into three segments that capture differences in attitudes toward new agricultural technologies: “Green Urbanites,” “Environmentally Unconcerned,” and “Skeptical Foodie.” Our findings reveal that Green Urbanites are the most open to adopting CEA, GE, and FA, while Skeptical Foodies and Environmentally Unconcerned are more reluctant. We contribute to theory by studying a novel facet of consumer acceptance of sustainable technologies and revealing how consumption, living, and lifestyle patterns motivate new technology acceptance in the agricultural sector. To inform practice, we suggest tailored strategies to increase engagement of the identified segments and promote wider acceptance of sustainable agricultural practices for enhanced food security. • Sustainable agricultural technologies can help achieve food security • Consumers differ in their perceptions and evaluations of these technologies • Green Urbanites are most likely to adopt sustainable agricultural technologies • Skeptical Foodies and Environmentally Unconcerned are less likely • The segments differ in a range of managerially-relevant characteristics

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123697
Citations
20
Primary Topic
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainable agricultural technologies of the future: Determination of adoption readiness for different consumer groups

Fabian Bartsch, Alexander Schnack, Amy Errmann, Victoria‐Sophie Osburg
20 citations
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
13.52
article

Sustainable agricultural technologies of the future: Determination of adoption readiness for different consumer groups

Fabian Bartsch, Alexander Schnack, Amy Errmann, Victoria‐Sophie Osburg
article en
20 citations

Abstract

The rapid increase in population and unsustainable agricultural practices has significantly damaged the environment. Our study explores how to achieve food security through environmentally friendly methods such as controlled environment agriculture (CEA), genetic editing (GE), and farming automation (FA), with an emphasis on the importance of consumer acceptance of these technologies. Analyzing data from 2138 Australians and 1760 New Zealanders, we employ a two-step clustering method—(1) hierarchical clustering and (2) k-means clustering—to categorize consumers on the basis of their demographic and lifestyle preferences into three segments that capture differences in attitudes toward new agricultural technologies: “Green Urbanites,” “Environmentally Unconcerned,” and “Skeptical Foodie.” Our findings reveal that Green Urbanites are the most open to adopting CEA, GE, and FA, while Skeptical Foodies and Environmentally Unconcerned are more reluctant. We contribute to theory by studying a novel facet of consumer acceptance of sustainable technologies and revealing how consumption, living, and lifestyle patterns motivate new technology acceptance in the agricultural sector. To inform practice, we suggest tailored strategies to increase engagement of the identified segments and promote wider acceptance of sustainable agricultural practices for enhanced food security. • Sustainable agricultural technologies can help achieve food security • Consumers differ in their perceptions and evaluations of these technologies • Green Urbanites are most likely to adopt sustainable agricultural technologies • Skeptical Foodies and Environmentally Unconcerned are less likely • The segments differ in a range of managerially-relevant characteristics

Technological Forecasting and Social ChangeVol. 208
Plant & Food Research (NZ), Auckland University of Technology (NZ), Montpellier Business School (FR)
New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
13.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.