Novice and Experienced Teachers’ Beliefs and Stated Attitudes About Oral Corrective Feedback

This study aims to investigate novice and experienced teachers’ stated beliefs and attitudes about oral corrective feedback (OCF) and the similarities and differences between them. Certain qualitative and quantitative research techniques were employed in this study to answer the research questions. Regarding qualitative design, some interviews were conducted to find out novice and experienced teachers’ stated beliefs about OCF. The quantitative part of the study is based on data collected through Situations for Error Correction (SEC) Simulation. The novice and experienced teachers were asked to write how they would respond to each situation and why they would respond that way. The aim of this tool was to identify the novice and experienced teachers’ stated attitudes. The results indicated that although there were some similarities between the novice and experienced teachers’ beliefs and attitudes about OCF, their OCF strategies and beliefs varied regarding correcting errors concerning language components.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.1447219
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Novice and Experienced Teachers’ Beliefs and Stated Attitudes About Oral Corrective Feedback

Kemal Sinan Özmen, Hale Ülkü Aydın
Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Novice and Experienced Teachers’ Beliefs and Stated Attitudes About Oral Corrective Feedback

Kemal Sinan Özmen, Hale Ülkü Aydın
article en

Abstract

This study aims to investigate novice and experienced teachers’ stated beliefs and attitudes about oral corrective feedback (OCF) and the similarities and differences between them. Certain qualitative and quantitative research techniques were employed in this study to answer the research questions. Regarding qualitative design, some interviews were conducted to find out novice and experienced teachers’ stated beliefs about OCF. The quantitative part of the study is based on data collected through Situations for Error Correction (SEC) Simulation. The novice and experienced teachers were asked to write how they would respond to each situation and why they would respond that way. The aim of this tool was to identify the novice and experienced teachers’ stated attitudes. The results indicated that although there were some similarities between the novice and experienced teachers’ beliefs and attitudes about OCF, their OCF strategies and beliefs varied regarding correcting errors concerning language components.

Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi DergisiVol. 44(2)
TED University (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Novice and Experienced Teachers’ Beliefs and Stated Attitudes About Oral Corrective Feedback — Kemal Sinan Özmen, Hale Ülkü Aydın · Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS