“They Were Married in Heart”: Race, Inheritance, and Interracial Common-Law Marriage in Reconstruction Era Mississippi

Abstract: In 1869, Mississippi voters ratified a radical new constitution that eliminated distinctions of race, including in its provision formalizing the unions of cohabiting couples as legal common law marriages at the time of ratification. Although white men had long established relationships of concubinage with Black women, the new constitution made it possible for interracial couples to claim the status of legal families. This article examines how Black women and their biracial children employed the 1869 state constitution to situate themselves as legal wives and legitimate children and the lawful heirs of dead white men. In response, white supremacists sought to deny them legitimacy by casting all relationships between Black women and white men as forms of concubinage that could never constitute legal marriages. This article examines how judges used the classification of concubine to distinguish Black common-law wives from white ones, undermining the radicalism of the new state constitution. By making it more difficult for Black widows and children to claim to be the rightful heirs of white men, the courts channeled inheritances toward more distant white relatives.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Civil War Era
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/cwe.2024.a935998
Primary Topic
American Constitutional Law and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“They Were Married in Heart”: Race, Inheritance, and Interracial Common-Law Marriage in Reconstruction Era Mississippi

Kathryn Schumaker
The Journal of the Civil War Era
American Constitutional Law and Politics
article

“They Were Married in Heart”: Race, Inheritance, and Interracial Common-Law Marriage in Reconstruction Era Mississippi

Kathryn Schumaker
article en

Abstract

Abstract: In 1869, Mississippi voters ratified a radical new constitution that eliminated distinctions of race, including in its provision formalizing the unions of cohabiting couples as legal common law marriages at the time of ratification. Although white men had long established relationships of concubinage with Black women, the new constitution made it possible for interracial couples to claim the status of legal families. This article examines how Black women and their biracial children employed the 1869 state constitution to situate themselves as legal wives and legitimate children and the lawful heirs of dead white men. In response, white supremacists sought to deny them legitimacy by casting all relationships between Black women and white men as forms of concubinage that could never constitute legal marriages. This article examines how judges used the classification of concubine to distinguish Black common-law wives from white ones, undermining the radicalism of the new state constitution. By making it more difficult for Black widows and children to claim to be the rightful heirs of white men, the courts channeled inheritances toward more distant white relatives.

The Journal of the Civil War EraVol. 14(3)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
American Constitutional Law and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.