Qualitative system dynamics modelling to support the design and implementation of tuberculosis infection prevention and control measures in South African primary healthcare facilities

Tuberculosis infection prevention and control (TB IPC) measures are a cornerstone of policy, but measures are diverse and variably implemented. Limited attention has been paid to the health system environment, which influences successful implementation of these measures. We used qualitative system dynamics and group-model-building methods to (1) develop a qualitative causal map of the interlinked drivers of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) transmission in South African primary healthcare facilities, which in turn helped us to (2) identify plausible IPC interventions to reduce risk of transmission. Two 1-day participatory workshops were held in 2019 with policymakers and decision makers at national and provincial levels and patient advocates and health professionals at clinic and district levels. Causal loop diagrams were generated by participants and combined by investigators. The research team reviewed diagrams to identify the drivers of nosocomial transmission of Mtb in primary healthcare facilities. Interventions proposed by participants were mapped onto diagrams to identify anticipated mechanisms of action and effect. Three systemic drivers were identified: (1) Mtb nosocomial transmission is driven by bottlenecks in patient flow at given times; (2) IPC implementation and clinic processes are anchored within a staff 'culture of nominal compliance'; and (3) limited systems learning at the policy level inhibits effective clinic management and IPC implementation. Interventions prioritized by workshop participants included infrastructural, organizational and behavioural strategies that target three areas: (1) improve air quality, (2) improve use of personal protective equipment and (3) reduce the number of individuals in the clinic. In addition to core mechanisms, participants elaborated specific additional enablers who would help sustain implementation. Qualitative system dynamics modelling methods allowed us to capture stakeholder views and potential solutions to address the problem of sub-optimal TB IPC implementation. The participatory elements of system dynamics modelling facilitated problem-solving and inclusion of multiple factors frequently neglected when considering implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Policy and Planning
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czae084
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Qualitative system dynamics modelling to support the design and implementation of tuberculosis infection prevention and control measures in South African primary healthcare facilities

Anna Vassall, Karina Kielmann, Aaron S Karat, Karin Diaconu et al.
2 citations
Health Policy and Planning
Complex Systems and Decision Making
0.49
article

Qualitative system dynamics modelling to support the design and implementation of tuberculosis infection prevention and control measures in South African primary healthcare facilities

Anna Vassall, Karina Kielmann, Aaron S Karat, Karin Diaconu, Anna Voce, Alison D. Grant, Jennifer Falconer, Nicky McCreesh, Fiametta Bozzani
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Tuberculosis infection prevention and control (TB IPC) measures are a cornerstone of policy, but measures are diverse and variably implemented. Limited attention has been paid to the health system environment, which influences successful implementation of these measures. We used qualitative system dynamics and group-model-building methods to (1) develop a qualitative causal map of the interlinked drivers of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) transmission in South African primary healthcare facilities, which in turn helped us to (2) identify plausible IPC interventions to reduce risk of transmission. Two 1-day participatory workshops were held in 2019 with policymakers and decision makers at national and provincial levels and patient advocates and health professionals at clinic and district levels. Causal loop diagrams were generated by participants and combined by investigators. The research team reviewed diagrams to identify the drivers of nosocomial transmission of Mtb in primary healthcare facilities. Interventions proposed by participants were mapped onto diagrams to identify anticipated mechanisms of action and effect. Three systemic drivers were identified: (1) Mtb nosocomial transmission is driven by bottlenecks in patient flow at given times; (2) IPC implementation and clinic processes are anchored within a staff 'culture of nominal compliance'; and (3) limited systems learning at the policy level inhibits effective clinic management and IPC implementation. Interventions prioritized by workshop participants included infrastructural, organizational and behavioural strategies that target three areas: (1) improve air quality, (2) improve use of personal protective equipment and (3) reduce the number of individuals in the clinic. In addition to core mechanisms, participants elaborated specific additional enablers who would help sustain implementation. Qualitative system dynamics modelling methods allowed us to capture stakeholder views and potential solutions to address the problem of sub-optimal TB IPC implementation. The participatory elements of system dynamics modelling facilitated problem-solving and inclusion of multiple factors frequently neglected when considering implementation.

Health Policy and PlanningVol. 39(10)
University of London (GB), Queen Margaret University (GB), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Public Health Institute (US), Africa Health Research Institute (ZA), Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde (BE), University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Economic and Social Research Council, Research England
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
0.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.