Surfacing Conflicts in Participatory Design: Methodological Considerations

Surfacing conflicts in values and assumptions between stakeholders is central to building constructive relationships in a participatory design (PD) engagement. Methodological considerations are required to surface such conflicts and hold onto them as constructive elements in the design process, rather than diffusing tensions. These considerations must become part of PD practice. In this workshop, we invite PD scholars and practitioners to reflect on their practices and discuss ways to consciously reveal conflicts. In addition, we introduce the concept of “conscientious discourse” which encourages reflection on one’s own perspective while seeking to understand others. We believe conscientious discourse could be one way to surface conflicts and engage with tensions as vital constructive components. In the workshop, participants will chart methodological guidelines for embracing conflict in future participatory design projects. We will document unresolved questions and issues to share back with the broader PD community.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3661455.3669891
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surfacing Conflicts in Participatory Design: Methodological Considerations

Christian Matheis, Aakash Gautam, Deborah Tatar, Gopinaath Kannabiran
3 citations
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
1.12
article

Surfacing Conflicts in Participatory Design: Methodological Considerations

Christian Matheis, Aakash Gautam, Deborah Tatar, Gopinaath Kannabiran
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Surfacing conflicts in values and assumptions between stakeholders is central to building constructive relationships in a participatory design (PD) engagement. Methodological considerations are required to surface such conflicts and hold onto them as constructive elements in the design process, rather than diffusing tensions. These considerations must become part of PD practice. In this workshop, we invite PD scholars and practitioners to reflect on their practices and discuss ways to consciously reveal conflicts. In addition, we introduce the concept of “conscientious discourse” which encourages reflection on one’s own perspective while seeking to understand others. We believe conscientious discourse could be one way to surface conflicts and engage with tensions as vital constructive components. In the workshop, participants will chart methodological guidelines for embracing conflict in future participatory design projects. We will document unresolved questions and issues to share back with the broader PD community.

University of Pittsburgh (US), Guilford College (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
1.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.