Social sharing of emotion during the collective crisis of <scp>COVID</scp> ‐19

We collected data from two sources - social media and online questionnaires - to investigate the emotional consequences of social sharing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Study 1 tracked and analysed sentiment of tweets posted over the course of a month in the crisis period and found that users who tweeted more frequently about COVID-19 expressed decreasing negative sentiment and increasing positive sentiment over time. Granger causality tests confirmed that this association was better interpreted in the forward direction (sharing levels predicting sentiment) than in the reverse direction (sentiment predicting sharing levels). Study 2 focused on immediate emotional consequences of sharing COVID-19-related events and found that participants reported improved overall affect about an event after sharing it, especially when that event was a personal experience rather than a news story. Reported positive feelings about both kinds of events were also significantly higher after sharing. Taken together, both studies suggested that social sharing is linked with emotional relief and may therefore help people to deal with their negative experiences during a persistent collective crisis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Psychology
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12729
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social sharing of emotion during the collective crisis of COVID ‐19

Jonas Schöne, Gloria Wai Shan, Brian Parkinson
3 citations
British Journal of Psychology
Misinformation and Its Impacts
3.40
article

Social sharing of emotion during the collective crisis of COVID ‐19

Jonas Schöne, Gloria Wai Shan, Brian Parkinson
article en
3 citations

Abstract

We collected data from two sources - social media and online questionnaires - to investigate the emotional consequences of social sharing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Study 1 tracked and analysed sentiment of tweets posted over the course of a month in the crisis period and found that users who tweeted more frequently about COVID-19 expressed decreasing negative sentiment and increasing positive sentiment over time. Granger causality tests confirmed that this association was better interpreted in the forward direction (sharing levels predicting sentiment) than in the reverse direction (sentiment predicting sharing levels). Study 2 focused on immediate emotional consequences of sharing COVID-19-related events and found that participants reported improved overall affect about an event after sharing it, especially when that event was a personal experience rather than a news story. Reported positive feelings about both kinds of events were also significantly higher after sharing. Taken together, both studies suggested that social sharing is linked with emotional relief and may therefore help people to deal with their negative experiences during a persistent collective crisis.

British Journal of PsychologyVol. 115(4)
University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Social sharing of emotion during the collective crisis of <scp>COVID</scp> ‐19 — Jonas Schöne, Gloria Wai Shan, et al. · British Journal of Psychology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS