The Researcher's Plight: Guilt and Shame in Participatory Design and Action Research

This paper delves into the emotional landscape of researchers engaged in participatory design and action research. It addresses the less-discussed aspects of unwanted emotions, such as guilt and shame, experienced by researchers during and post-project. The paper explores the guilty dichotomy between the researchers' intent to contribute positively and the reality of unmet expectations. The unease stemming from perceived exploitation and the limitations of project impact is scrutinised, highlighting the tightrope walked in participatory design. Furthermore, the paper discusses the paradox of professional recognition versus the ongoing adversities faced by what may be marginalised communities. Through reflective analysis, this paper contributes to a deeper understanding of the emotional landscape traversed by researchers in participatory design and action research. It underscores the need for supportive frameworks that address these emotional aspects, advocating for ethical reflexivity and sustained engagement strategies that align closely with community needs and well-being.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3661455.3669865
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Participatory Visual Research Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Researcher's Plight: Guilt and Shame in Participatory Design and Action Research

Lars Rune Christensen, Hasib Ahsan
2 citations
Participatory Visual Research Methods
2.26
article

The Researcher's Plight: Guilt and Shame in Participatory Design and Action Research

Lars Rune Christensen, Hasib Ahsan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper delves into the emotional landscape of researchers engaged in participatory design and action research. It addresses the less-discussed aspects of unwanted emotions, such as guilt and shame, experienced by researchers during and post-project. The paper explores the guilty dichotomy between the researchers' intent to contribute positively and the reality of unmet expectations. The unease stemming from perceived exploitation and the limitations of project impact is scrutinised, highlighting the tightrope walked in participatory design. Furthermore, the paper discusses the paradox of professional recognition versus the ongoing adversities faced by what may be marginalised communities. Through reflective analysis, this paper contributes to a deeper understanding of the emotional landscape traversed by researchers in participatory design and action research. It underscores the need for supportive frameworks that address these emotional aspects, advocating for ethical reflexivity and sustained engagement strategies that align closely with community needs and well-being.

IT University of Copenhagen (DK)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Participatory Visual Research Methods
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.