Laying the groundwork: Building trust with a marginalised community in Mumbai, India

Participatory design highlights the complexity of individuals' identities, social connections, power relationships to one another, and connections to the environment in which they live. Ideal participation assumes fairness and transparency, however, fair and transparent participation seldom happens, and less so for marginalised people living in slums. There is a lack of literature around the work required to contextualise the barriers towards equitable participation. In this paper, I outline participatory barriers with a marginalised community living in a slum in Mumbai, India from ethnographic studies conducted over a period of four months with residents living, working, socialising, studying and playing within that community. I identified four non-exhaustive categories of local challenges faced by community members, including terrain interconnectedness, ownership and legal rights, agency of decision making, and the sense of community. This work presents an evolving methodology that aims to reframe the lack of agency into exercising change for collective well-being within the community.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3661455.3669882
Citations
2
Primary Topic
ICT in Developing Communities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Laying the groundwork: Building trust with a marginalised community in Mumbai, India

Xavier Ho, Ilya Fridman, Arnab Jana, Bishal Goswami et al.
2 citations
ICT in Developing Communities
1.56
article

Laying the groundwork: Building trust with a marginalised community in Mumbai, India

Xavier Ho, Ilya Fridman, Arnab Jana, Bishal Goswami, Venkatesh Rajamanickam
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Participatory design highlights the complexity of individuals' identities, social connections, power relationships to one another, and connections to the environment in which they live. Ideal participation assumes fairness and transparency, however, fair and transparent participation seldom happens, and less so for marginalised people living in slums. There is a lack of literature around the work required to contextualise the barriers towards equitable participation. In this paper, I outline participatory barriers with a marginalised community living in a slum in Mumbai, India from ethnographic studies conducted over a period of four months with residents living, working, socialising, studying and playing within that community. I identified four non-exhaustive categories of local challenges faced by community members, including terrain interconnectedness, ownership and legal rights, agency of decision making, and the sense of community. This work presents an evolving methodology that aims to reframe the lack of agency into exercising change for collective well-being within the community.

Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN), Monash University (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
ICT in Developing Communities
1.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.