Comparative clinical and radiographic results of three fixation systems for transverse subcapital osteotomy in treating hallux valgus

Objective: Compare three fixation models for Bosch osteotomy both clinically and radiographically.Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted on patients surgically treated for hallux valgus using Bosch osteotomywith three different fixation systems. The first group was treated with a temporary pin for three weeks; the second, received thesame pin plus a screw; and the third, used two screws without a pin. Radiographic analysis included the intermetatarsal angle,metatarsophalangeal angle, percentage of lateral shifting of the metatarsal head, dorsal or plantar migration of the metatarsal head,and consolidation time. Clinical evaluation was performed using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale.Complications during follow-up were recorded.Results: Twenty hallux valgus were included in each group. No significant differences were found in radiographic evaluations amonggroups in the preoperative and final follow-up, except that the third group showed less loss of correction. There were no significantdifferences in consolidation times. Clinical improvements were observed in all three fixation systems, with no significant differencesamong them according to the AOFAS scale.Conclusion: No significant clinical or radiographic differences were observed among the three fixation systems, except that the groupusing two screws showed less loss of correction. Level of evidence IV; Therapeutic studies; Case series.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Foot & Ankle
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30795/jfootankle.2024.v18.1759
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative clinical and radiographic results of three fixation systems for transverse subcapital osteotomy in treating hallux valgus

Ezequiel Catá, I. Nieto
Journal of the Foot & Ankle
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
article

Comparative clinical and radiographic results of three fixation systems for transverse subcapital osteotomy in treating hallux valgus

Ezequiel Catá, I. Nieto
article en

Abstract

Objective: Compare three fixation models for Bosch osteotomy both clinically and radiographically.Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted on patients surgically treated for hallux valgus using Bosch osteotomywith three different fixation systems. The first group was treated with a temporary pin for three weeks; the second, received thesame pin plus a screw; and the third, used two screws without a pin. Radiographic analysis included the intermetatarsal angle,metatarsophalangeal angle, percentage of lateral shifting of the metatarsal head, dorsal or plantar migration of the metatarsal head,and consolidation time. Clinical evaluation was performed using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale.Complications during follow-up were recorded.Results: Twenty hallux valgus were included in each group. No significant differences were found in radiographic evaluations amonggroups in the preoperative and final follow-up, except that the third group showed less loss of correction. There were no significantdifferences in consolidation times. Clinical improvements were observed in all three fixation systems, with no significant differencesamong them according to the AOFAS scale.Conclusion: No significant clinical or radiographic differences were observed among the three fixation systems, except that the groupusing two screws showed less loss of correction. Level of evidence IV; Therapeutic studies; Case series.

Journal of the Foot & AnkleVol. 18(2)
Weatherford College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.