On the role of the preheat temperature in electron-beam powder bed fusion processed IN718

• Slight preheat temperature variation (1000 vs. 950°C) impact hardness in E-PBF IN718. • 50°C difference significantly impacts solid-state microstructure evolution. • High preheat temperature leads to significant γ" precipitation and hardness increase. • Simulation of precipitation behavior aligns well with experiments. • Results underpin importance of preheat optimization for microstructure-property control. Process parameters optimization in additive manufacturing (AM) is usually required to unlock superior properties, and this is often facilitated by modeling. In electron beam powder bed fusion (E-PBF), the preheat temperature is an important parameter to be optimized as it significantly influences the microstructure and properties. Here we compare the effect of two preheat temperatures (1000 and 950°C, above and below δ-phase solvus temperature) on the microstructural evolution of E-PBF IN718 Ni-based superalloy. Using thermal and thermo-kinetic modeling, we predict microstructural changes and compare them with experimental findings. A decrease of only 50°C in the preheat temperature has a low impact on the solidification microstructure with a slight reduction in columnar grain width. In the solid-state, higher preheating causes intergranular δ-phase precipitation, contributing to a higher γ" precipitation potential, formation of co-precipitates, and higher hardness. The lower preheat temperature induces intergranular and intragranular δ-phase precipitation, reducing the γ" precipitation potential and hardness. The chemical composition of γ' and γ" is largely unaffected by the preheat temperature variation. These insights underscore the importance of preheat temperature optimization in microstructure design and property control during E-PBF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Additive Manufacturing Letters
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addlet.2024.100238
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the role of the preheat temperature in electron-beam powder bed fusion processed IN718

N. Haghdadi, Sophie Primig, Michael Haines, Nana Kwabena Adomako
8 citations
Additive Manufacturing Letters
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
1.70
article

On the role of the preheat temperature in electron-beam powder bed fusion processed IN718

N. Haghdadi, Sophie Primig, Michael Haines, Nana Kwabena Adomako
article en
8 citations

Abstract

• Slight preheat temperature variation (1000 vs. 950°C) impact hardness in E-PBF IN718. • 50°C difference significantly impacts solid-state microstructure evolution. • High preheat temperature leads to significant γ" precipitation and hardness increase. • Simulation of precipitation behavior aligns well with experiments. • Results underpin importance of preheat optimization for microstructure-property control. Process parameters optimization in additive manufacturing (AM) is usually required to unlock superior properties, and this is often facilitated by modeling. In electron beam powder bed fusion (E-PBF), the preheat temperature is an important parameter to be optimized as it significantly influences the microstructure and properties. Here we compare the effect of two preheat temperatures (1000 and 950°C, above and below δ-phase solvus temperature) on the microstructural evolution of E-PBF IN718 Ni-based superalloy. Using thermal and thermo-kinetic modeling, we predict microstructural changes and compare them with experimental findings. A decrease of only 50°C in the preheat temperature has a low impact on the solidification microstructure with a slight reduction in columnar grain width. In the solid-state, higher preheating causes intergranular δ-phase precipitation, contributing to a higher γ" precipitation potential, formation of co-precipitates, and higher hardness. The lower preheat temperature induces intergranular and intragranular δ-phase precipitation, reducing the γ" precipitation potential and hardness. The chemical composition of γ' and γ" is largely unaffected by the preheat temperature variation. These insights underscore the importance of preheat temperature optimization in microstructure design and property control during E-PBF.

Additive Manufacturing LettersVol. 11
UNSW Sydney (AU), Division of Materials Science and Engineering (AU), Imperial College London (GB)
Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation, University of New South Wales, University of Sydney, Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources, Australian Government, Australian Research Council, Defence Science and Technology Group
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.