Assessing biological invasion predatory impacts through interaction strengths and morphological trophic profiling

Abstract Biological invasions are a major stressor on ecosystems worldwide, but tools to predict their predatory impact remain limited. Here, we quantified invader impacts using two complementary approaches: functional responses (to reveal per capita and multiple predator interaction strengths) and ecomorphology (to reveal trophic profiles and competitive overlap). We compared Mozambique tilapia Oreochromis mossambicus, a native southern African cichlid, and a near-trophically analogous invasive congener, the Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus . Both Nile tilapia and Mozambique tilapia exhibited a potentially prey population destabilizing Type II functional response. In both single and multiple predator pairings, invasive Nile tilapia had significantly greater prey consumption rates than native Mozambique tilapia, and thereby a greater predatory impact than its native congeneric. Attack rates were greater for Nile tilapia than Mozambique tilapia, with both species showing more similar handling times and maximum feeding rates. No evidence for multiple predator effects was detected within or between these species, and therefore impacts of both species increased additively in the presence of conspecific or heterospecific competitors. Morphological trait analyses found general differences between these two species, with the invasive Nile tilapia having distinctively larger lower jaw closing force, gill resistance and gill raker length, which facilitated greater feeding capacities over the native species. Trophic profiles predicted using morphological trait differences showed high dietary overlap and served as evidence for potential exploitative competition between the two species. These results reveal superior interaction strengths and ecomorphological trait profiles of an invasive over native species which could influence impact and native species replacement dynamics. Novel applications of functional response and ecomorphology provide complementary insights into predatory and competitive impacts from invasive species, aiding impact prediction across environmental contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Invasions
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-024-03435-x
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing biological invasion predatory impacts through interaction strengths and morphological trophic profiling

Ross N. Cuthbert, Ryan J. Wasserman, Josephine Pegg, Nobuhle Phumzile Mpanza
4 citations
Biological Invasions
Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
1.84
article

Assessing biological invasion predatory impacts through interaction strengths and morphological trophic profiling

Ross N. Cuthbert, Ryan J. Wasserman, Josephine Pegg, Nobuhle Phumzile Mpanza
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Biological invasions are a major stressor on ecosystems worldwide, but tools to predict their predatory impact remain limited. Here, we quantified invader impacts using two complementary approaches: functional responses (to reveal per capita and multiple predator interaction strengths) and ecomorphology (to reveal trophic profiles and competitive overlap). We compared Mozambique tilapia Oreochromis mossambicus, a native southern African cichlid, and a near-trophically analogous invasive congener, the Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus . Both Nile tilapia and Mozambique tilapia exhibited a potentially prey population destabilizing Type II functional response. In both single and multiple predator pairings, invasive Nile tilapia had significantly greater prey consumption rates than native Mozambique tilapia, and thereby a greater predatory impact than its native congeneric. Attack rates were greater for Nile tilapia than Mozambique tilapia, with both species showing more similar handling times and maximum feeding rates. No evidence for multiple predator effects was detected within or between these species, and therefore impacts of both species increased additively in the presence of conspecific or heterospecific competitors. Morphological trait analyses found general differences between these two species, with the invasive Nile tilapia having distinctively larger lower jaw closing force, gill resistance and gill raker length, which facilitated greater feeding capacities over the native species. Trophic profiles predicted using morphological trait differences showed high dietary overlap and served as evidence for potential exploitative competition between the two species. These results reveal superior interaction strengths and ecomorphological trait profiles of an invasive over native species which could influence impact and native species replacement dynamics. Novel applications of functional response and ecomorphology provide complementary insights into predatory and competitive impacts from invasive species, aiding impact prediction across environmental contexts.

Biological InvasionsVol. 26(12)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Rhodes University (ZA), South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity (ZA)
Leverhulme Trust, National Research Foundation, Rhodes University, South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
1.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.