Subsidies for close substitutes: Aggregate demand for residential solar electricity

Subsidies promoting residential solar systems are intended to reduce carbon emissions by lowering demand for electricity from the grid. The ability of these subsidies to reduce grid demand hinges on how close, on aggregate, the two sources of electricity are to perfect substitutes. To test the efficacy of these policies, we form a tractable model of national residential electricity demand that identifies the aggregate substitutability between residential systems and electricity drawn from the grid. When estimated on the United States, we find that while the two are close to perfect substitutes, the degree to which substitutability is imperfect has material implications for policy. Subsidies inducing one kWh of residential solar electricity demand displace only 0.5 kWh of grid consumption. As an emissions reduction policy, subsidies had national abatement costs of $332 per MTCO 2 in 2018.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Economic Review
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2024.104848
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subsidies for close substitutes: Aggregate demand for residential solar electricity

Nick Pretnar, Alexander Abajian
4 citations
European Economic Review
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
0.41
article

Subsidies for close substitutes: Aggregate demand for residential solar electricity

Nick Pretnar, Alexander Abajian
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Subsidies promoting residential solar systems are intended to reduce carbon emissions by lowering demand for electricity from the grid. The ability of these subsidies to reduce grid demand hinges on how close, on aggregate, the two sources of electricity are to perfect substitutes. To test the efficacy of these policies, we form a tractable model of national residential electricity demand that identifies the aggregate substitutability between residential systems and electricity drawn from the grid. When estimated on the United States, we find that while the two are close to perfect substitutes, the degree to which substitutability is imperfect has material implications for policy. Subsidies inducing one kWh of residential solar electricity demand displace only 0.5 kWh of grid consumption. As an emissions reduction policy, subsidies had national abatement costs of $332 per MTCO 2 in 2018.

European Economic ReviewVol. 170
University of California, Santa Barbara (US), University of Rochester (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
0.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Subsidies for close substitutes: Aggregate demand for residential solar electricity — Nick Pretnar, Alexander Abajian · European Economic Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS